When you think paranoia thrillers, vintage films like The Conversation (1974), All the President’s Men (1976), The Parallax View (1974), and Three Days of the Condor (1975) likely spring to mind. But there’s an equally gripping film that dates back much earlier than the 1970s, long before the political fallout from Watergate and Vietnam: the original Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956), directed by Don Siegel. Kevin McCarthy and Dana Wynter star as Dr. Miles Bennell and Becky Driscoll, a doctor and his former girlfriend who discover their small California town is being replaced by emotionless alien duplicates grown from giant pods. As the invaders assimilate the local police, government, and citizens while they sleep, Miles and Becky desperately flee to warn the outside world before fatigue forces them to succumb.
To listen to a recording of our CineVerse group discussion of Invasion of the Body Snatchers, conducted last week, click here. This original bigscreen version of Jack Finney’s story continues to be a surprisingly effective and evergreen horror film as well as one of the best science fiction movies of all time. Reviewer Richard Scheib
insists this is “the best thing the science-fiction genre ever produced in the 1950s,” adding that “it may be the most paranoid film ever made.” Filmmaker Mick Garris called this film “a genre movie for grown-ups,” lauding it as one of the first attempts to make an adult sci-fi movie at a time in the mid-fifties when almost every other science-fiction film was a cheap exploitation title marketed toward teenagers and juveniles. And reviewer Chris Justice
wrote that “no film captures the anxieties of an entire decade of American history better.”
Body Snatchers remains relevant and resonant because its paranoia persists. At a time when extraterrestrial invaders came from without, the concept of being invaded from within and replaced (explored earlier in It Came From Outer Space and Invaders From Mars, both 1953) was fresh and frightening 70 years ago. But it continues to pack enough of a disturbing punch that this story gets remade every few years.
This work boasts several unforgettably chilling scenes: the pod hatching sequence in the greenhouse; the moment Miles kisses Becky but shockingly discovers she’s an emotionless shell of her former self gazing up at him with dead eyes; Miles discovering Becky’s double in her father’s basement; the deep focus shot of Jack’s supine doppelganger in the foreground opening his eyes, causing Theodora to scream; the wide shot of the Santa Mira citizens converging on the town square to organize their pod dissemination efforts; Miles overhearing plans to put a pod inside a baby’s playpen; and the famous penultimate ending on the freeway when a raving Miles tries in vain to convince any of the motorists to heed his warnings.
What’s particularly impressive is that, despite its hyperbolic title, it doesn’t suffer from typical genre tropes and limitations of its era. There is no violence or killing shown, jump scares are absent, and the monsters – the pods and the replica humans created from them – aren’t the ridiculous-looking alien thingies you’d expect from a 1950s horror show, and they’re sparingly shown. Yet they prove graphically effective thanks to clever prop effects like pneumatic air bladders that pop out realistic rubber body molds nestled inside latex-and-foam pod shells, slathered in a gooey outer bubbly coating of rubber cement, soap, and chemical foam. What’s more, the plot, dialogue, and monologue are thought-provoking, the fear generated is convincing and well-earned, and the acting is praiseworthy – a rare combination of quality for a genre picture from this era. And the storytelling is admirably economical: At only 80 minutes long, the narrative moves along at a brisk, confident pace without any superfluous scenes.
Considering that it was produced on a relatively small budget of $350,000, and that it was originally double billed in theaters with either The Atomic Man or The Indestructible Man, sometimes running second to those films in select markets, Invasion of the Body Snatchers is regarded as one of the greatest B pictures or low-budget genre films of all time. (Other contenders include Detour (1945), Gun Crazy (1950), Narrow Margin (1952), Carnival of Souls (1962), Night of the Living Dead (1968), The Texas Chain Saw Massacre (1974), The Evil Dead (1981), Re-Animator (1985), and Tremors (1990).)
Helmed with skill and savvy by Siegel, some critics, like
DVD Savant Glenn Erickson, believe this is his best work in a directing career that included quality films like Riot in Cell Block 11 (1954), The Lineup (1958), The Killers (1964), The Beguiled (1971), Dirty Harry (1971), The Shootist (1976), and Escape from Alcatraz (1979). Let’s also give flowers to screenwriter Daniel Mainwairing, who penned the script for Out of the Past (1947), veteran cinematographer Ellsworth Fredericks, whose noirishly intense monochrome lighting scheme shines with a shadowy silver brilliance, and composer Carmen Dragon, who crafted a bold, brassy score with brilliantly discordant piano undertones.
The fact that there have been three big-screen remakes so far – Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978), Body Snatchers (1993), and The Invasion (2007) – indicates its pervasive influence. Plenty of fans give the nod to the 1978 remake as the superior film, but it’s hard to argue with the historical impact and ingenuity of the 1956 original. Seventy years ago, this concept would have been more original and frightening. Imagine living in the Eisenhower era, at the height of the Red Scare, and seeing this film for the first time: It could have been the most alarming motion picture you’d ever seen. The 1978 version, on the other hand, is just as thematically terrifying but has scarier images and scenes that have aged quite well. Essayist Kier-La Janisse wrote: “Each successive film version of Body Snatchers becomes progressively more cynical, but Siegel’s version remains the one most intimately connected to the time in which it was made, and a well of very specific post-war anxieties.”
On which genre shelf does Snatchers belong: science-fiction, or horror? Arguably, there isn’t much “sci-fi” here; lots of fiction, but not much science. In other words, the aliens look just like us, the special effects are minimal, and there’s no spacecraft or otherworldly technology shown. Still, these seed pods came from outer space, which clearly marks this material as SF. But Invasion of the Body Snatchers plays more convincingly as a work of genuine horror. The way it unnerves, accelerates the distrust, and engulfs Miles and Becky in a hopeless nightmare is fright film fuel all the way. The fact that their antagonists aren’t violent, vindictive, emotional, or monstrously menacing-looking adds to the unease while undercutting our expectations for a horror movie.
Helping matters immeasurably is Siegel’s steady hand, moving the narrative along at an efficient clip and building tension with a quickening pace and increasing vibe of apprehension, foreboding, and desperation. He was considered a workhorse of a director and a practical storyteller who valued lean precision, no-frills effectiveness, and, in a way, perpetual motion. For proof, ponder how nearly every scene here is kinetic, with characters regularly walking, running, driving, searching, skulking, hiding, escaping, even dancing. From the opening credits, which showcase clouds darting quickly across the sky, we know that this will be an on-the-move movie, with action unfolding continually and rapidly. Siegel wisely insisted on shooting on location in familiar California locations as well as night-for-night filming to give evening scenes the inky blacks he wanted. And he chose a healthy mix of compositions, alternating between tight framing and wide vistas, between claustrophobic close-ups and revealing wide shots.
The director believed “the world is populated by pods, and I wanted to show them… They have no feelings. They exist, breathe, sleep… It’s the idea that people aren’t who you think they are, that which you love most and care about the most remains externally everything you know, but, in fact, internally has become something else. There is never a moment of security. Everything is topsy-turvy, and nothing lasts. But of course, American society is predicated on a kind of fantasy that things turn out well and that there’s stability. This is the whole middle-class dream. And of course, there is no stability. So a movie that says everything you think you know – you’re in a safe community with middle-class white people in an agrarian community in which everybody knows you, and nobody has to lock the back door – guess what? You’re not safe at all.”
Body Snatchers has planted seed pods across entire generations of cinema and pop culture. It gave rise to the common idiom “pod people,” a term that describes an emotionless, bland person who kowtows to the herd mentality while devaluing individualism. And at a time when most science-fiction alien invasion movies focused on external threats from beyond coming to Earth, it made the threat internal, coming from within, a scary notion in the 1950s that gave rise to later horror and sci-fi works, including: Quatermass 2 (1957), I Married a Monster from Outer Space (1958), The Brain Eaters (1958), Village of the Damned (1960), The Day of the Triffids (1962), Red Nightmare (1962), The Earth Dies Screaming (1964), It Happened Here (1965), Invasion (1965), Seconds (1966), Quatermass and the Pit (1967), Night of the Living Dead (1968), The Stepford Wives (1975), God Told Me To (1976), Alien (1979), The Thing (1982), Halloween III: Season of the Witch (1982), Strange Invaders (1983), The Stuff (1985), Night of the Creeps (1986), The Hidden (1987), They Live (1988), The Puppet Masters (1994), The Faculty (1998), Slither (2006), and Annihilation (2018). A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984) further developed the blood-curdling concept of being attacked or infiltrated when you fall asleep.
Indeed, Invasion works as a powerful and important sociopolitical allegory that can speak to each new generation in different ways. In 1956, the two main allegorical readings were that it was either a conservative warning or a liberal message.
In 1956, the Cold War with the Soviet Union was at fever pitch, and fears of communism secretly spreading across the United States were rampant. Body Snatchers was viewed as an obvious parable decrying the dangers of communist infiltration in American society and, therefore, a conservative treatise. But 1956 was also just two years after the conclusion of the anti-Communist hearings conducted by Senator Joseph McCarthy, a period when the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) was aggressively forcing members of the entertainment industry to name communists and communist sympathizers. These witch hunts by government officials fomented distrust and apprehension among the public. Body Snatchers plays into that paranoia and the pressure to acquiesce to governmental and societal demands for conformity, making it appear as a left-leaning movie.
Consider, too, that Invasion reminded some that year of highly publicized reporting on the brainwashing of American soldiers during the Korean War. This brainwashing allegory served both political sides: for conservatives, it symbolized the cold, godless depersonalization of foreign communist subversion, while for lefties, it represented the terrifying surrender of individual conscience to domestic state-enforced conformity and witch-hunt hysteria. Others interpret the film’s mass hysteria vibe as tapping into 1950s fears of science run amok and atomic war, as well as disillusionment with suburban conformity.
Additionally, ponder the romantic subplot about Miles and Becky, two recent divorcees who now have the hots for each other but are thwarted from indulging in their desires by sudden urgent circumstances and societal interference. Perhaps it’s a stretch, but maybe this is a more liberal reading of the film that subtly criticizes conservative values, which would have frowned on divorce, being childless and single, and the representation of a relatively strong female character (one who even drives the car while her man rides as a passenger).
Erickson puts more stock in the conservative message,
writing: “The film's spokesperson for Pod-ism is the psychiatrist Danny Kauffman, who affects a slight air of elite intellectualism. He's the kind of person that conservatives distrust and accuse of disloyalty. The Pods sneak around, conspiring in the shadows to effect an invisible revolution. ‘Join us,’ they say, and throw away the stifling chains of humanity. That's a communist appeal.”
Actor Kevin McCarthy believed no political allegory was premeditated, and Siegel himself said that “the political reference to Senator McCarthy and totalitarianism was inescapable, but I tried not to emphasize it because I feel that motion pictures are primarily to entertain and I did not want to preach.”
Ultimately, Body Snatchers reinforces a sobering message: Conformity kills. Invasion posits the importance of being an authentic human being, living life with passion and verve, and thinking for yourself. “Love, desire, ambition, faith,” and other virtues are core qualities that make us human and allow us to express our individuality and exist uniquely. But once you devalue or surrender these traits, you've been dehumanized, and you’re no different than anyone else – part of the mindless herd that follows the crowd and blindly obeys authority. Miles articulates this concern well: “I've seen how people have allowed their humanity to drain away. Only it happened slowly instead of all at once. They didn't seem to mind... All of us - a little bit - we harden our hearts, grow callous. Only when we have to fight to stay human do we realize how precious it is to us, how dear.” In this paradigm, falling asleep is akin to turning off your mind and relinquishing control and creativity.
The film also adeptly explores three key fears: losing your identity, the unknown, and infiltration from external threats that become internal —including permeation of sociopolitical forces like communism into mainstream society. It reminds us that no person or place is truly safe from these perils, which can take fresh forms. In Body Snatchers, the peace and sanctity of small-town suburbia is a myth; fear, conspiracy, and corruption can occur anywhere and affect anyone. “The mind is a strange and wonderful thing,” Dr. Kauffman says. “I'm not sure it will ever be able to figure itself out. Everything else maybe, from the atom to the universe. Everything except itself.” These words reinforce the notion of the mysteries of human existence, and the existential dilemma of never being able to truly know yourself—which further implies that we are each vulnerable to invasion from within.
What also makes Snatchers so thematically mortifying is that the horrible can happen in the darkest shadows as well as broad daylight, with the latter proving the most disturbing. Per Scheib, “Invasion of the Body Snatchers is a film that uses the fear of night probably more so than any other horror film ever made – night and sleep are the realms of fear, day is the realm of reason. What is interesting is that the film sides with irrationality and night, rather than day and reason…It is really a film about the divide between the fear that nightmares hold and the rationalism that the waking world offers…The psychiatrist’s explanation the morning after that the pods are part of a mass hallucination becomes so convincing that the film’s entire perspective changes about in a single moment – one believes it because it sounds so rational.”
Invasion of the Body Snatchers’ greatest gift to us all, 70 years later, is that the premise and primary conflict remain terrifying and eternally adaptable. Here’s a story suggesting you can’t trust that anyone is their authentic self, even your closest loved ones; that individuality and the essence of being human can be secretly and suddenly stripped away; that you should fear falling asleep, lest you awaken forever altered; and that you will be relentlessly hunted and forced by society to fall in line and assimilate.
And consider how a rewatch can symbolically reflect more modern fears, such as the anxiety over being replaced by artificial intelligence, distress around conformity to an authoritarian or totalitarian government, or the repercussions of an overreliance on and desensitization caused by technology and groupthink, leading to a lack of independent critical thought. Siegel’s classic never fails to snatch our imaginations and tap into fresh fears.
Unfortunately, we have that tacked-on prologue and epilogue to reckon with. It’s a framing device that certainly feels forced (which it was), demonstrating that the studio suits were afraid of the original nihilistic ending and concerned about box office appeal. The conclusion offers a ray of hope, suggesting that we need to wake up and fight back; “It’s an emergency!” are the last words we hear. Yet, even if the final scene nullifies some of the stark impact of the freeway scene where Miles rants, “You’re next! They’re here already!”, looking closer, the shoehorned psychiatric ward sequence doesn’t necessarily give us confidence that the convinced psychiatrist is going to persuade anyone in Washington or curb the inevitable nationwide takeover. (Interestingly, the movie was distributed without the prologue and epilogue in Europe. It’s unfortunate that no version of this truncated cut exists anywhere that you can purchase, rent, or stream.)
Another flaw is that the film is sometimes confusing and inconsistent in its rules about how pod people actually replace their originals and how the “snatching” works, as well as what happens to the corpus mortuum. How and why does Becky turn into a pod person inside the cave near the conclusion? We don’t see any pod nearby, and the body that Miles carries and kisses appears to be the same Becky who merely fell asleep and was suddenly transformed. Doesn’t the replica have to emerge from an actual pod? For that matter, how is Jack’s doppelganger on the pool table able to mature as fast as it does, including opening its eyes, while the real Jack remains himself?
But these are but minor blemishes on an otherwise seamless work that the American Film Institute ranked as the ninth-best film in the science-fiction genre. Invasion of the Body Snatchers also earned a spot at #53 on Entertainment Weekly’s 1999 list of the greatest movies of all time, while Time magazine featured it across three separate honors: its 100 all-time best films, the top 10 1950s sci-fi movies, and the top 25 horror films. IGN rated it the 15th-best sci-fi picture, and the Chicago Film Critics Association named it the 29th scariest film ever made. Today, the film maintains widespread critical acclaim, holding a 9.2 out of 10 weighted average among critics and a 98% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes versus a Metascore of 92 on Metacritic.
Read more...
Posts
