No CineVerse meeting on Jan. 2
Sunday, December 30, 2018
CineVerse will not meet on Wednesday, Jan. 2 due to the Oak View Center building being closed. We will meet instead on Jan. 9. Happy New Year!
Read more...CineVerse will not meet on Wednesday, Jan. 2 due to the Oak View Center building being closed. We will meet instead on Jan. 9. Happy New Year!
Read more...There are exciting things afoot at CineVerse in the first 2 months of the new year. Check out the all-new CineVerse January/February 2019 calendar, available here.
Read more...It would be downright cruel to ask anyone not to enjoy the day after Christmas with their families. So stay home Dec. 26, folks--there will be no CineVerse meeting that day. We'll see you back at your friendly neighborhood film discussion group in early January 2019. Happy holidays!
Read more...Irving Berlin's tune "White Christmas" was, for more than 50 years, the biggest selling song of all time. That makes it all the more fascinating to go back and rediscover an often forgotten and overlooked Christmastime film, "Holiday Inn," in which the song made its debut. "Holiday Inn" may not be as fondly remembered as its remake, "White Christmas," but thanks to the collaboration of its three titan entertainers--Bing Crosby, Fred Astaire and Berlin--it's got too much talent to tank. Here's our recap of this movie, as discussed at CineVerse yesterday:
WHAT DID YOU FIND MEMORABLE, NOTEWORTHY OR UNEXPECTED ABOUT THIS PICTURE?
Long considered a noir masterpiece, “Laura” (1944) has a different kind of noir pedigree than most films of this subgenre. Parsing through these differences was part of the fun of last night’s CineVerse meeting. Here are the notes from that discussion:
HOW IS “LAURA” DIFFERENT FROM OTHER NOIR FILMS YOU’VE SEEN?
Christopher Guest has a knack for lampooning wannabes, hacks, washed-up talents and struggling artists, as evidenced in his multiple mockumentaries. He showcases these deft skills quite impressively in his directorial debut, "Waiting for Guffman," which flew well under the radar on its initial release but has since become a cult classic that even spawned, ironically enough, an off-Broadway musical (!). Last evening, CineVerse evaluated this picture and came away with the following thoughts:
WHAT TOOK YOU BY SURPRISE ABOUT THIS FILM OR DEFIED YOUR EXPECTATIONS, GOOD OR BAD?
"Amadeus" nailed the major maestro biopic subgenre back in 1984. Ten years later, a group of filmmakers would attempt the same feat with "Immortal Beloved," spotlighting perhaps the greatest musical genius in classical music history, Ludwig Van Beethoven. The critical reception was spotty, and box-office receipts weren't stellar. But this picture has a lot going for it, foremost because the soundtrack (solely consisting of Beethoven's own music) is masterful, the casting of Gary Oldman in the lead role is spot-on, and the cinematography is sumptuous and robust. CineVerse analyzed this movie last night and came away with these conclusions:
MOVIES SIMILAR TO IMMORTAL BELOVED
Just a reminder that, as is tradition this time of year, CineVerse will not meet on the day before Thanksgiving (Nov. 21). The Oak View Center building will be closed. Happy Thanksgiving to all!
Read more..."They don't make 'em like they used to" is an axiom that is appropriately applied to any of the classic Warner Brothers gangster flicks the studio churned out in the 1930s, many of which starred James Cagney. The only thing that could top a Cagney picture was one in which he was paired with Humphrey Bogart, as was the case with "The Roaring Twenties" (1939). CineVerse took a trip back to the bootlegger era and watched this picture last night; not a single attendee gave a thumbs down. Here are our reflections on the movie:
Nowadays, homosexual characters are much more accepted and prevalent in mainstream films. But it wasn't that long ago that this wasn't the case. One film that wasn't afraid to depict a gay love story, at a time when gays were more criticized, scrutizined, parodied, caricatured and marginalized (1987), is "Maurice," a lesser-known Merchant/Ivory gem that portrays how difficult it was to hide and maintain a homosexual relationship in Britain's repressive pre-World-War I era. CineVerse had much to talk about last night, including the following:
WHAT DID YOU FIND INTERESTING OR UNEXPECTED ABOUT THIS FILM?
Take your young'ns trick-or-treating, carve a Jack-o-lantern, toilet paper your neighbor's house, or tremble in fear over the midterm elections, but DON'T come to CineVerse on October 31, as there is no meeting that night. Happy Halloween!
Read more...Eager to learn what's on tap at CineVerse in November and December? Check out the new 2-month calendar, available here.
Read more...Horror films bug some viewers enough to the point where they can't watch them. Others embrace the creepy-crawly aspect of fright films and are willing to let a good scary movie get under their skin--a movie like David Cronenberg's remake of "The Fly" (1986), for example. Our CineVerse science experiment last night was to examine this picture close under a group discussion microscope. Here are our study findings:
WHAT DID YOU FIND UNEXPECTED OR REFRESHINGLY DIFFERENT ABOUT THIS FILM, ESPECIALLY COMPARED TO THE 1958 ORIGINAL?
Ridley Scott's "Alien" set the bar high for sci-fi horror, introducing a terrifying new extraterrestrial creature into the pop culture lexicon, plumbing the depths of body horror, and incorporating elements from the slasher subgenre to heighten the scare factor. The movie was a radical departure from audience expectations for horror/science-fiction, infusing fascinating thematic elements that leave a lot to think about long after the credits roll. Here's CineVerse's take on this late 1970s fright film gem:
HOW WAS THIS FILM DIFFERENT AND SURPRISING FROM OTHER SCIENCE-FICTION, HORROR AND ACTION FILMS THAT CAME BEFORE IT?
It might be easy today for some to dismiss George Romero's "Night of the Living Dead" as schlocky, dated and amateurish. But these folks would be missing the big picture. Because, truth is, this film was enormously influential on the horror genre and pop culture. It also remains an effective chiller five decades following its release. Here's further evidence of these claims, as discussed yesterday at CineVerse:
It's interesting that some of the greatest horror movie classics of all time were B-pictures often made on shoestring budgets (consider, for instance, the original "Halloween," "Night of the Living Dead," and "Cat People"). Slotting nicely within this formula is arguably the best scary movie of the 1950s, Don Siegel's "Invasion of the Body Snatchers," which works across many subgenres, including the paranoid political thriller and the alien invasion sci-fi flick. Over 60 years later, the original continues to hold us tight in its suspenseful grip. Here are some of the reasons why, as discussed yesterday at CineVerse:
WHAT DID YOU FIND DIFFERENT, REFRESHING OR UNEXPECTED ABOUT INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS?
How do you build an effective action film without much action? Turn it into a whodunit western thriller and cast Spencer Tracy in the lead role as a deceptively strong and resourceful protagonist on a mystery mission in a small town where nobody wants him around. That's the recipe at work in "Bad Day at Black Rock," and it cooks up a pretty tasty stew for audiences to savor. For further proof, here's a summary of our major CineVerse discussion points from last night:
THEMES BUILT INTO THIS FILM INCLUDE:
A good "fish-out-of-water" story, when told well, can be satisfying to movie watchers. "Mao's Last Dancer" is that kind of tale, told from the perspective of a Chinese dancer-turned-dissident who discovers the wonders and possibilities of America while never forgetting his homeland and the family he left behind. Here's a recap of our group discussion of this film last night at CineVerse (to hear the full recorded discussion, click here):
WHAT DID YOU FIND INTRIGUING, REFRESHING, OR UNEXPECTED ABOUT “MAO’S LAST DANCER”?
They just don't make films like "Sergeant York" anymore. Truth is, who would swallow the sincerity and genuine patriotism today? That would be some heavy lifting for a contemporary filmmaker and a modern audience. Yet it's fascinating to examine the propagandistic power and forthright folksiness of Howard Hawks' 1941 picture, which wears its heart--and its love of country in a time of war--on its sleeve. These thoughts made for a compelling conversation last night at CineVerse, during which time we discussed the following:
OTHER FILMS DIRECTED BY HOWARD HAWKS:
Pairing up Morgan Freeman with a popular and respected A-list actor (like Jessica Tandy in "Driving Miss Daisy," Tim Robbins in "Shawshank Redemption," Brad Pitt in "Se7en," and Clint Eastwood in "Million Dollar Baby") and having him serve as the "Jiminy Cricket conscience" of the duo has worked wonders over the past three decades. Would casting Freeman alongside Robert Redford in "An Unfinished Life" repeat that magic and elevate the film as a cut above? The jury was split on this one, as evidenced by the reception (mostly positive) to the film last evening at CineVerse. Here's a recap:
Not many motion pictures take as many left turns as Neal Jordan's "The Crying Game" from 1992, which starts out as a political thriller, shifts into a strange love story, then meshes these two elements into a gripping third act. Of course, there's a shocking twist along the way (SPOILER! Dil, a love interest of the main protagonist, is revealed to be transgender) that created much buzz and controversy 26 years ago. The film still has the power to provoke robust thought and discussion, as shown last night at CineVerse. Here's a summary of our talking points:
WHAT DID YOU FIND FASCINATING, UNEXPECTED OR EVEN OFFPUTTING ABOUT THIS FILM?
© Blogger template Cumulus by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008
Back to TOP