Blog Directory CineVerse: 2025

School's out with Sugarpuss in the house

Wednesday, April 30, 2025

When a nightclub singer moves in with a house full of studious professors – most of whom have virtually no experience around the opposite sex – you know things are about to get delightfully screwy. Ball of Fire, released in 1941, is a prime example of a sharp-scripted classic comedy, one that’s regarded as the last substantial screwball released prior to World War II. The plot follows Professor Bertram Potts, a shy linguistics expert played with unexpected comic flair by Gary Cooper. Sequestered with seven other scholars in a Manhattan mansion while compiling an encyclopedia, Potts heads into the city to study contemporary slang and crosses paths with Sugarpuss O’Shea, a street-smart nightclub singer played by the incomparable Barbara Stanwyck. Sugarpuss, hoping to avoid police scrutiny over her mobster boyfriend Joe Lilac, finds refuge with the unsuspecting academics, turning their orderly world upside down. What follows is a lively mix of romance, mistaken identities, and cultural clashes.

To listen to a recording of our CineVerse group discussion of Ball of Fire, conducted last week, click here (if you get an error message, simply refresh the page).


Ball of Fire boasts an astounding glut of talent from Hollywood’s golden age—including director Howard Hawks; producer Samuel Goldwyn; cinematographer Gregg Toland (note how he shoots the professors in deep focus, as was his pioneering trademark style; the result is that they are depicted as harmonizing well together, with each having equal importance to their group); co-writers Billy Wilder and Charles Brackett; stars Stanwyck and Cooper; familiar character actors Oskar Homolka (I Remember Mama, Sabotage, War and Peace), Henry Travers (It’s a Wonderful Life, Mrs. Miniver, The Bells of St. Mary’s), S.Z. Sakall (Casablanca, Christmas in Connecticut, Yankee Doodle Dandy), Tully Marshall (Queen Kelly, The Cat and the Canary), Leonid Kinskey (Casablanca, Duck Soup), Richard Haydn (The Sound of Music, Alice in Wonderland), and Aubrey Mather (The Green Years, The Hour Before the Dawn); along with heavies Dan Durea and Dana Andrews (what a luxury to have leading man Andrews rounding out your cast!); legendary costume designer Edith Head; film composer extraordinaire Alfred Newman; and even Gene Krupa and his band, who make a memorable cameo.

This is an obvious modernized retelling of Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, only told in reverse: In the fairy tale, a pure young woman finds shelter with seven kind old men who protect her from danger; in this version, a worldly woman hides out with seven eccentric fellows, not to be ultimately saved by them but to soften and transform their sheltered lives – especially that of the bashful Potts.

Ball of Fire is loaded with coded adult content in its language and situations: Consider how Sugarpuss is a striptease dancer who flaunts her legs, midriff, and attractive figure, and recall how she and others use suggestive lines and double entendres like “Once I watched my big brother shave,” “This is yum-yum,” “Brother, we’re going to have some hoy toy toy,” “Shove in your clutch,” and “I figured on working all night.” It’s a wonder this work got approved by the censors.

Cooper is an interesting, if not offbeat casting choice—he’s not known for playing a stuffed shirt bookworm; instead, he was often cast as a populist everyman who made up in looks, bravery, and honesty what he lacked in the brains department.

Ball of Fire isn’t a comedy of remarriage or a classic confrontational battle of the sexes like other screwballs, including The Awful Truth, His Girl Friday, and The Philadelphia Story. It’s also not a picture that pokes fun at the idle rich or depicts their comeuppance, like My Man Godfrey, It Happened One Night, or The Lady Eve. While there is ample witty dialogue, this is certainly less frenetic and slower-paced than Hawks’ other two previous screwball masterworks Bringing Up Baby and His Girl Friday. The director remarked that the tone was more subdued here because, he said in an interview: “…it was about pedantic people. When you've got professors saying lines, they can't speak 'em like crime reporters. So we naturally slowed up - couldn't do anything about it. Also, it was a little bit further from truth and a little more allegorical…It didn't have the same reality as the other comedies and we couldn't make it go with the same speed."

Senses of Cinema essayist Brian Wilson noted that “Ball of Fire is among the very few Hawks films in which the intellectual, although treated at times as an absurd figure, achieves a level of heroism.”

Interestingly, Hawks was known for recycling and borrowing elements from his own films and those he remade. He directed His Girl Friday, a reimagining of The Front Page, and helmed the classic western Rio Bravo, which he later reworked as El Dorado and Rio Lobo. Similarly, his film Ball of Fire inspired a musical remake, A Song is Born, also directed by Hawks, with many of the shots, sets, costumes, and actor mannerisms closely mirroring those in the original.

Several core concepts drive this narrative. Certainly, this is a “street smarts versus book smarts” story: Sugarpuss possesses the former while Potts has the latter. Ball of Fire teaches us that worldly wisdom from learned experience is often more valuable than classroom knowledge. As the tale progresses, the professors become more accepting of streetwise sensibilities and come out of their sclerotic scholarly shells.

It’s also a film contrasting highbrow from lowbrow. The movie cleverly juxtaposes the refined, structured, and ordered world of academia and its flowery language and snooty sensibilities with the more gritty, street-level culture and zeitgeist vernacular represented by Sugarpuss, the gangsters, the garbageman, and other off-the-street characters who infiltrate the professors’ world.

Thanks to his exposure to Sugarpuss, Potts branches out from the claustrophobic confines of his rigid academic sphere and learns more about the real world as well as the value of love and affection, signifying that symbiotic growth is a latent idea here. Potts’ decency and chivalry, meanwhile, rub off on her and trigger a personal transformation by the end of the story; O’Shea refuses to marry Lilac, turning her sincere affection to Potts. Likewise, the seven other professors seem changed for the better thanks to their exposure to Sugarpuss.

Similar works

  • Meet John Doe, a Frank Capra drama also released in 1941 and starring Cooper and Stanwyck
  • The Lady Eve, another screwball that debuted in 1941 and features Stanwyck
  • Bringing Up Baby, Hawks’ superior screwball from 1938 that also presents a hilarious dynamic between a similar stuffed shirt scholar and the free-spirited woman he falls in love with
  • The More the Merrier, a 1943 screwball depicting a woman (Jean Arthur) who shares her apartment with two men, leading to a series of humorous misunderstandings

Other films by Howard Hawks 

  • Scarface (1932)
  • Bringing Up Baby (1938)
  • Only Angels Have Wings (1939)
  • His Girl Friday (1940)
  • Sergeant York (1941)
  • The Big Sleep (1946)
  • Gentlemen Prefer Blondes (1953)
  • Rio Bravo (1959)
  • To Have and Have Not (1944)
  • Red River (1948)
  • The Thing from Another World (1951; directed by Christian Nyby)

Read more...

A century later, there's still no tarnish on this Gold

Thursday, April 24, 2025


Released 100 years ago this June, The Gold Rush remains Charlie Chaplin’s most ambitious and impressive work, a silent-era comedic masterpiece that he wrote, directed, produced, and starred in as his iconic character, the Little Tramp. Chaplin found his muse in the stark realities of history: the Klondike Gold Rush of the late 1800s and the crossing of the Chilkoot Pass, a grueling journey undertaken by gold prospectors heading to the Yukon; and the haunting desperation of the Donner Party – a group of American pioneers who set out for California in a wagon train in 1846 but became trapped by heavy snowfall in the Sierra Nevada mountains during the winter of 1846 to 1847. Facing extreme starvation and harsh conditions, some members of that group resorted to cannibalism to survive; of the 87 people in the party, only 48 made it to California alive.

Fascinated by the razor-thin line between tragedy and humor, Chaplin infused this bleak inspiration into a humorous but poignant tale of hardship and survival. The result was a story about a hopeful drifter seeking fortune in the frozen North, battling hunger, cold, isolation—and the occasional grizzly bear.

Click here to listen to a recording of our CineVerse group discussion of The Gold Rush, conducted earlier this month. To hear the latest Cineversary podcast episode spotlighting the 100 anniversary of The Gold Rush, click here.


The Gold Rush is a shining example of Chaplin’s cinematic savvy. Every element—from its episodic narrative and emotional undercurrent to the meticulous visual design and remarkable set pieces—is handled with remarkable finesse. The attention to period detail is also astonishing, especially the attempt to recreate the crossing of the Chilkoot Pass and mimic the look, attire, and expeditions of that period based on antique photographs. Chaplin and his team amazingly recreated this historical period and wintry environment on warm Hollywood lots and soundstages. Ponder, too, that the production spanned 17 months and included hundreds of actors and extras.

Even after a century, The Gold Rush remains highly entertaining and deeply resonant in its themes and poignancy. Its success, of course, lies in its ability to evoke laughter and deep feelings through physical comedy and pantomime rather than spoken dialogue. The narrative remains completely accessible even without understanding a single word. The simplicity of its visual storytelling makes it universally appealing—even to young audiences or those who don’t speak English or read the intertitles. What makes the film truly timeless is its ability to transcend cultural and linguistic boundaries.

In a terrific supplement on the Criterion Collection edition of this movie, West African filmmaker Idrissa Ouedraoga said: “With Chaplin, its feelings that matter most, and feelings are universal. You don’t see the color of the skin. You don’t see a white man. You see the feelings…What stays with you the most are all the moments of laughter and his somewhat bizarre and unique way of walking. Also, the fact that he’s just a scrap of a man…He was an adult but also a child.”

What is it about Chaplin’s approach to humor in this movie and his comic sensibilities that make it so timeless? The Little Tramp is kind of an everyman—a surrogate for the audience on a journey, quest, adventure, or experience. He’s a likable underdog by virtue of being diminutive, often surrounded by bigger and stronger but not always smarter men. “Chaplin’s tramp is the essence of the outsider looking in, the little man excluded from the party,” DVD Savant writer Glenn Erickson wrote.

Because the humor is often self-deprecating, making the Tramp the butt of jokes and a subject of humiliation, he evokes well-earned sympathy and empathy amidst the comedy. Some argue that Chaplin’s sensibilities are overly sentimentalized – that there’s too much pathos and maudlin mushiness in his movies – especially compared to his contemporary Buster Keaton. Others feel Chaplin hits the perfect emotional chords to leave us feeling satisfied by the end of the picture.

“Yes, Chaplin did frequently deploy a gooeyness that you have to sop up with a sponge,” according to critic Mark Bourne. “But in The Gold Rush the tendency is restrained. And anyway, to sniff at him for balancing baggy trousers with expressions of love or heartbreak is like dissing Shakespeare for trucking out the iambic pentameter. At our distance generations later, we have no first-hand experience with the fact that his introducing poignancy to movie comedy was a great leap forward for the medium and for audiences alike. Nonetheless, anyone who remains untouched by the Tramp-Georgia scenes probably likes lima beans.”

The key to appreciating the Little Tramp is to realize that the inherent charm and humor come from presenting a cartoonish character who always tries to maintain dignity, pride, normalcy, and virtue despite repeatedly being embarrassed, belittled, overlooked, mistreated, and not taken seriously and notwithstanding his impoverished look and condition.

He also embodies gallantry, civility, sincerity, and romantic sensibilities that make you root for him. Erickson continued: “His depiction of romantic innocence is one of the highlights of the silent cinema.”

To better appreciate Chaplin and his approach to comedy, it’s also important to be aware of what motivated him. For starters, he was famously meticulous, often investing more time and money into perfecting a single film than most major studios would spend on several productions. His films frequently unfold as a string of vignettes that can stand alone like short stories, yet come together to form a cohesive, emotionally resonant whole. And one of Chaplin’s greatest strengths was his ability to portray the human condition in a way that transcended language, allowing audiences of all backgrounds—including those who couldn’t read—to connect deeply with his stories. Indeed, profoundly emotional undercurrents run through Chaplin’s work, where sentiment and humor are intertwined to create stories infused with sorrow and joy, pain and ecstasy, universal feeling, and the human condition.

The Gold Rush can boast of being among the first of its kind in several categories. It’s the first feature-length comedy epic, preceding Keaton’s The General by a year and being worthy of that word thanks to its impressive scope – blending vast, visually stunning landscapes and period authenticity with high production values that emphasize Chaplin's visionary approach to storytelling on an largescale level. Chaplin historian Jeffrey Vance agreed, penning: “The Gold Rush has an epic quality. The film presents adventures on a grand, heroic scale that are organically united through the central character of the Tramp…The Gold Rush is his greatest and most ambitious silent film; it was also the longest and most expensive comedy film produced up to that time.” Vance also points out that the film was “revolutionary in its use of film comedy to depict a dramatic historic event,” with the director opting to shoot on location on a scale he had never previously attempted.

The Gold Rush contains one of the earliest and most charming examples of the mistaken flirtation gag, where the tramp misinterprets a wave from a woman at a dance hall, thinking it's meant for him, only to realize she’s gesturing to someone else. This comedic misunderstanding has since become a recurring device in film, evolving through the decades in tone and style. Later examples include similar sequences and Annie Hall (1977), Naked Gun: From the Files of Police Squad! (1988), Dumb and Dumber (1994), There's Something About Mary (1998), Love Actually (2003), Mr. Bean's Holiday (2007), Crazy, Stupid, Love (2011), and La La Land (2016). Each of these films features a variation of the moment where a male character misreads attention or affection from afar, only to discover it's intended for someone else.

This film also may be responsible for the trope of a male character acting with wild, carefree enthusiasm – blissfully unaware that his romantic interest is watching him look utterly ridiculous. Subsequent movies that borrowed this trope include Singin’ in the Rain (1952), where Gene Kelly splashes through puddles in lovestruck joy; The Nutty Professor (1963), where Jerry Lewis's awkward charm backfires in front of his crush; Back to the Future (1985), which sees Marty McFly lose himself in a rock performance as his mother looks on in confusion; The Mask (1994) exaggerates this gag with cartoon-level antics; Napoleon Dynamite (2004), which features a hilariously earnest dance routine that earns quiet admiration from a watching classmate; and 500 Days of Summer (2009), where a fantasy dance number reflects a character’s inner euphoria.

In the final scene of the 1925 original version, we see the Tramp and Georgia kiss while their picture is being taken; the photographer says “Oh, you’ve spoilt the picture,” to which the Tramp responds with a dismissive hand gesture, as if to say “I don’t care; deal with it.” This has to be one of the first meta in-jokes in a feature-length comedy, wherein Chaplin is acknowledging that his penchant for sentimentality and romantic closure can be frowned upon by some viewers and critics as soppy and self-indulgent; nevertheless, the filmmaker believes this is the proper conclusion that ties up any loose romantic threads and reveals exactly how these two characters – and the two real actors, who fell in love on set – feel about each other.

In addition, The Gold Rush proved that great comedies can generate boffo box office. This persists as the highest-grossing silent comedy ever made. It helped in 1925 that Chaplin was the planet’s most recognizable person and one of the highest-paid entertainers. Chaplin financed The Gold Rush himself through United Artists, the film company he co-founded in 1919 with Douglas Fairbanks, Mary Pickford, and D.W. Griffith, which allowed him complete creative and financial control. The 1925 silent version of the film cost an estimated $923,000 to make—a massive sum for the time. This high cost was largely due to the filmmaker’s perfectionism, the movie’s extended production timeline, and its elaborate sets and special effects, including large-scale recreations of the Klondike wilderness. With The Gold Rush, Chaplin set a powerful example for future independent filmmakers – that they could accomplish their vision even without the backing of a major studio. His determination in this and future feature film projects likely paved the way for others to take creative risks in the name of meaningful, innovative cinema.

Earlier historical events, literature, and films that likely inspired The Gold Rush include the true story of the Donner Party; the crossing of the Chilkoot Pass and the Klondike Gold Rush; Jack London’s books The Call of the Wild (1903) and White Fang (1906), which similarly focus on survival in harsh environments; Harold Lloyd’s Safety Last (1923), which mirrors Chaplin’s physical comedy; Buster Keaton’s The Navigator (1924), a comedy that draws on Chaplin’s use of isolation and physical humor in the face of absurd challenges; and Erich Von Stroheim’s Greed (1924), another portrayal of survival and human struggle, though with a more tragic tone.

Cinematic works probably influenced by The Gold Rush, at least to some degree, include The Three Stooges short Pardon My Scotch (1935), which features an homage to the dance of the rolls sequence; North to Alaska (1960), an Alaskan frontier adventure that mirrors Chaplin’s use of humor in tough environments; Michael Madana Kama Rajan (1990) and Welcome (2007), two films from India that reuse the cabin-hanging-from-the-edge-of-a-cliff gag; Benny and Joon (1993), which again recreates the dance of the rolls; Fargo (1996), a film that shares a snowy, isolated setting, dark humor, and a wanted killer; The Artist (2011), which broadly reflects Chaplin's silent comedy style, blending physical gags with emotional depth; and Hundreds of Beavers (2022), another comedic survival story, drawing on Chaplin’s physical comedy in harsh environments.

At its core, The Gold Rush is about the interplay of greed, luck, and resourcefulness. All of these qualities come back to reward or punish the prospector characters we follow. Some also see this film as an allegory for the untapped potential of Hollywood at the time—where gold of another kind was waiting to be mined by intrepid prospectors, many of whom would suffer in defeat while others struck it rich in the young boomtown.

As mentioned earlier, Chaplin also expertly examines the thin line between comedy and calamity. Much of this humor is decidedly black, focusing on the stark reality of starvation and featuring desperate individuals willing to kill, cheat, steal, and commit cannibalism. As funny as The Gold Rush is, it’s easy to forget that two smaller characters are shot dead, their murderer also dies, a faceless prospector terminally collapses into the snow, and several characters nearly starve to death. “Chaplin’s theme for the film is the quest for basic human needs—food, money, shelter, acceptance, and love—set in the harsh environment of the Gold Rush,” wrote Jeffrey Vance. “It is no coincidence that the film’s setting mirrors the materialistic 1920s.” Chaplin himself mused: “In the creation of comedy, it is paradoxical that tragedy stimulates the spirit of ridicule; because ridicule, I suppose, is an attitude of defiance: we must laugh in the face of our helplessness against the forces of nature—or go insane.”

Takeaway #3? Inner warmth can keep you alive in a cold world. The Tramp survives in large part because he demonstrates courage in the face of Mother Nature, sincerity and chivalry to Georgia and her friends, loyalty to Big Jim, inventiveness by making a meal out of whatever he can find, and the virtues of humility. At the story’s conclusion, we see that the Tramp is willing to shed his fur coats and put his hobo outfit back on upon request, suggesting that he won’t forget where he came from or how he got to his place of success.

Of course, a recurring message in The Gold Rush and his other works is the celebration of the underdog; his iconic Little Tramp character is a lovable outsider who survives on wit, resilience, and heart, often finding friendship and dignity in the face of adversity.



The Gold Rush’s greatest present to birthday wishers is the sheer quantity of yuks on display, with so many of these bits continuing to generate big laughs 100 years onward. Cases in point: the tramp ‘s blissful ignorance that he’s being followed by a real bear, a creature he later wrestles with; fighting gale force winds inside the cabin with impossibly slippery feet; the rifle continually pointing at the hapless tramp, who ultimately thinks he’s been shot; Chaplin making a delicacy out of a consumed candle, followed soon by the ingestion of a boiled shoe; Big Jim having big chicken hallucinations; the famished tramp frantically sharpening the cutlery (a bit that gets funnier with every rewatch); the tramp being convinced Georgia is flirting with him when it’s actually the man behind him; Chaplin’s pants repeatedly falling down, followed by the tying of the dog leash around his waist and the dancing hijinks that follow; the little man believing he’s punched out his romantic nemesis when the culprit is actually a fallen clock; the tramp playing dead to get a gratis breakfast, instantly transforming from a frozen hobo to a picky guest with a voracious appetite; Chaplin lighting his foot, and the chair of Georgia’s friend, ablaze; the exuberant housesitter chaotically ransacking the cabin as Georgia secretly watches him, then trying to act dignified while covered in feathers; the snow shoveling gag and its three punchlines; the world-famous dance of the rolls routine; and, of course, the ramshackle cabin dangling off the precipice, which stands as the film’s finest set piece and most unforgettable piece of slapstick. There are also dozens of other laughs interspersed between these sequences, which speaks to The Gold Rush’s immense wealth of jokes. Some of the prospector characters in this story strike it rich, but the real motherload is the comedy gold Chaplin unearths in this film. The second greatest gift in a picture that thrives on carefully choreographed physicality is Chaplin’s not-so-subtle facial nuances, all calibrated to deliver maximum emotional and humorous impact. Buster Keaton had as impressive an array of comedic skills at his disposal, but the Stoneface couldn’t match Charlie in facial expressivity – Chaplin’s most underrated talent and the unquantifiable element that significantly enhances the hilarity in his works. From exaggerately arched eyebrows, to twee nose-scrunching that triggers a crinkled greasepaint mustache, to a smile that often alternated from a romantically ebullient grin to a Cheshire grimace, The Little Tramp had an endlessly malleable countenance that made all the other grand comedy gestures and elaborate funny bits work. Indeed, most of the heavy lifting in The Gold Rush occurs in the real estate beneath the bowler hat and above that wrinkled tie.

Read more...

An overlooked wonder from down under

Tuesday, April 22, 2025

Ask the younger set to explain – or even correctly pronounce – the Boer War and many will likely rephrase it in snarky fashion as the “bore” war (remember all those high schoolers dozing off in your history class?). But Breaker Morant, the gripping 1980 Australian historical war drama directed by Bruce Beresford that’s set during the Second Anglo-Boer War in 1901, is far from a dull watch. The film follows the court-martial of three Australian lieutenants in the Bushveldt Carbineers – Harry "Breaker" Morant, Peter Handcock, and George Witton – accused of murdering Boer prisoners and a German missionary. Adapted from Kenneth G. Ross’s play, it examines the moral ambiguities of wartime justice and how the men were allegedly sacrificed by the British military for political convenience.

Edward Woodward stars as the charismatic Morant, with Bryan Brown as the loyal Peter Handcock and Lewis Fitz-Gerald as the idealistic George Witton. Jack Thompson delivers a standout performance as Major J.F. Thomas, the inexperienced but principled lawyer defending them. The film remains highly regarded 45 years later for its literate script, taut direction, and powerful performances.

To listen to a recording of our CineVerse group discussion of Breaker Morant, conducted last week, click here.


The timing of this picture’s release in 1980 arguably helped it resonate with American audiences. That’s because the Boer War and this film draw many parallels to the Vietnam War, which Americans were still healing from emotionally 45 years ago. Both conflicts involved fighting against an elusive, hidden enemy that blended in with civilians and employed guerrilla tactics, leading to frustrating and bloody circumstances, including genocide. Consider how this narrative also conjures up loose comparisons to the tale of Lt. Calley and his conviction for the My Lai massacre in Vietnam in 1968.

The film is admirably structured, with interspersed flashbacks as opposed to being told chronologically; these flashbacks add emotional resonance to the courtroom scenes they are juxtaposed with. Likewise, Beresford does a commendable job telling the story relatively objectively, allowing viewers to come to their own moral judgments on Morant, Handcock, and Witton. There’s an agenda here, of course, to accentuate the unjust travesty of the entire trial, but the three prisoners aren’t so easily let off the ethical hook.

Breaker Morant doesn’t suffer from spending most of its time in the confines of a courtroom setting. The claustrophobic framing and tight compositions of the interior scenes contrast creatively with the expansive, colorful wide shots of the scenic countryside. By using long shots during the more action-oriented flashback sequences, the soldiers who will later stand trial are visually depicted as pawns on a large chessboard—small players on a large canvas. Contrast this with the frequent close-ups of the soldiers in the courtroom.

Thematically, the filmmakers trod interesting territory. Breaker Morant is foremost concerned with the injustices and hypocrisies of combat and the unfairness of the politics of the military elite. The film sharply critiques how morality in wartime is often inconsistent and politically motivated. Behaviors that were tacitly accepted in the heat of battle are later punished when convenient for higher command. This inconsistency exposes the way war enables brutal actions to be both condoned and condemned, depending on who benefits from the narrative. It’s not a film about guilt or innocence but about injustice, hypocrisy, and the falsity that war can be waged cleanly, completely honorably, and morally.

Consider the abundant ironies afoot in Breaker Morant. The trio is being tried for crimes they were ordered to commit. Many consider it a travesty to prosecute soldiers for murder in the context of a guerrilla war where there are basically no rules. Also, the fort is besieged by the Boers, and the prisoners are freed and allowed to kill more Boers before the trial continues.

This work also intelligently contemplates war’s toll on human lives and how combat pushes soldiers to commit extreme acts of horrific violence. Beyond the political and legal messages, it’s a powerful meditation on the emotional and psychological costs of warfare, for trying the soldiers as men deeply affected by the violence around them – often forced into morally ambiguous situations that leave lasting damage. This theme reinforces the broader tragedy of war beyond the battlefield.

Throughout Breaker Morant, there’s a strong undercurrent of emerging Australian nationalism, too. The picture presents the Australian soldiers as outsiders in a British-led military system, emphasizing their unique character, voice, and values. Their treatment during the trial highlights the tensions between colonial loyalty and a budding sense of independence, reflecting Australia's growing desire to distinguish itself from British imperial rule.

Breaker Morant also probes the limits of military duty by exploring the consequences of following orders. The film asks whether a soldier can or should be held morally accountable for actions taken under command. It anticipates later global conversations about wartime responsibility and ethics, especially those surrounding post-WWII trials.

Similar works

  • Paths of Glory (1957)
  • Judgment at Nuremberg (1961)
  • King and Country (1964)
  • Gallipoli (1981)
  • The Killing Fields (1984)
  • Casualties of War (1989)
  • A Few Good Men (1992)
  • The Thin Red Line (1998)
  • Australian wave of films that hit big in America in the late 1970s and 1980s including Mad Max (1979), The Road Warrior (1981), and Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome (1985); Gallipoli (1981); The Year of Living Dangerously (1982); The Man from Snowy River (1982); Crocodile Dundee (1986); and The Lighthorsemen (1987)
  • Other movies set during the Boer War, such as The Boer War (1914), The Adventurers (1951), Majuba: Heuwel van Duiwe (1968), Strangers at Sunrise (1969), Arende (1994), and Verraaiers (2013).

Other films by Bruce Beresford

  • Tender Mercies (1983)
  • Crimes of the Heart (1986)
  • Driving Miss Daisy (1989)

Read more...

Cineversary podcast honors 100th birthday of Chaplin's The Gold Rush

Wednesday, April 16, 2025

Jeffrey Vance
In Cineversary podcast episode #81, host ⁠Erik Martin⁠ goes prospecting for comedic gold by revisiting Charles Chaplin’s The Gold Rush on its 100th anniversary. Accompanying him on this expedition is Jeffrey Vance, a film historian, film archivist, and author of the book Chaplin: Genius Of The Cinema. Together, they mine the priceless merits of the Little Tramp’s hilarious and impressive adventure, examining how it has stood the test of time, what makes the laughs evergreen, and how scores of imitators have been influenced by this masterwork.

To listen to this episode, click here or click the "play" button on the embedded streaming player below. Or, you can stream, download, or subscribe to Cineversary wherever you get your podcasts, including Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

Learn more about the Cineversary podcast at www.cineversary.com and email show comments or suggestions to cineversarypodcast@gmail.com.

Read more...

Phở real

Wednesday, April 9, 2025

Vietnam may be in the news for all the wrong reasons lately (hint-hint: exorbitantly high tariffs), but one recent export that has proved to be a valuable cinematic offering is Inside the Yellow Cocoon Shell, directed by Phạm Thiên Ân and released in 2023. This debut feature-length film won the Caméra d'Or (Best First Feature) at the Cannes Film Festival, marking a significant emergence of Vietnamese cinema on the global stage. The film follows Thien, played by Le Phong Vu, a man living in bustling Saigon who is abruptly drawn into a spiritual and emotional journey when he is tasked with returning the body of his sister-in-law, who died in a motorbike accident, to their rural hometown. Along the way, he travels with his young nephew, Dao, and reconnects with elements of his past and lost faith, encountering old acquaintances such as his childhood friend, Sister Thao, played by Nguyen Thi Truc Quynh.


To hear a recording of our CineVerse group discussion of Inside the Yellow Cocoon Shell, conducted last week, click here.


Cocoon Shell is notable for embracing the classic hallmarks of “slow cinema”; this movement immerses viewers in a contemplative experience by emphasizing atmosphere and mood through deliberate pacing, evocative visuals, and simplified sound design. Often exploring everyday life, slow films highlight the mundane and unsaid, favoring subtle, non-verbal storytelling over dialogue. Typical characteristics include long takes (in this film, often extending several minutes, such as the sequence where Thien meets and talks with the older war veteran, which consists of an unbroken shot lasting over 20 minutes); moments of stillness, as evidenced by pauses in conversation, inaction, or simple acts of waiting; ambiguous and unresolved narratives; and sometimes cryptic dialogue.

Instead of presenting straightforward stories that progress ahead, slow cinema movies often employ reflective and meditative qualities that linger long on visuals and emphasize thematic elements. This film revels in all these traits, particularly extremely long takes (this may have been the easiest three-hour film to edit ever), as well as slow zoom-ins that are nearly invisible and leisurely camera moves.

What’s the benefit of consistently relying on marathon-length takes? Consider how most viewers are more accustomed to more frequent and rhythmic cutting between shots to break up scenes and provide visual variety, giving us new images to focus on and redirecting our attention. Letting a shot breathe longer without edits forces us to pay closer attention to the entire misc-en-scene, including the smallest details in the frame. And with so little dialogue and a meager plot, we remain more intently focused on Thien’s journey, interactions, and observations.

“By letting each scene play out in near-real time, Pham emphasizes Thien’s slow process of reconnecting with his roots, as well as the contrast between the pace of life that characterizes the village, where the slow camera movements and shot durations feel natural, and Saigon, where they come across as unnaturally sedentary,” wrote Slant magazine critic Jake Cole.

Nick Schager of the Daily Beast seconds these sentiments: “(Phạm Thiên Ân’s) camerawork moves at a contemplative, ambulatory pace which heightens the sense that Thien is floating through the world—an impression amplified by vistas of Vietnam’s rural villages, valleys and mountains encased in a layer of mist that seems to be pressing down on the Earth’s inhabitants, as well as a dream in which Thien bikes silently along hazy roads punctuated by other vehicles’ blooming headlights.”

Interestingly, the director also commonly prefers deep-focus long shots in which Thien is shown from a far distance amidst expansive outdoor settings, like the uncut sequence where he receives roadside help from a fellow motorbiker. Additionally, Thien and other characters are frequently framed within doorways, windows, behind glass, or opposite other portals, and placed symmetrically center in the frame.

Pham Thien An doesn’t only keep the camera running much longer than expected; He enjoys moments of quietude, visual stillness, and attention to relatively small details, too. Case in point: the protracted shot of the strange silvery object (apparently a cross) floating among the reeds, or the prolonged image of the glowing clock face.

Inside the Yellow Cocoon Shell is a masterclass in fascinating sound design, as well. We hear a myriad of ambient noises in both city and rural scenes, but our ears perhaps hone in more intently on the pastoral sounds.

While the scenes (with many typically consisting of one uncut shot) serve more as real-time vignettes shown linearly, the filmmakers interrupt temporal order and reality with a flashback (involving Thien and Thao kissing) and at least one dream or fantasy sequence: Recall the POV shot of Thien riding his motorbike through the rainy streets, and the scene where he visits with his brother’s new wife and baby – which may or may not be real, as we see him awaken abruptly atop his motorcycle, suggesting that the previous shots were slumber-ifically surreal.

Inside the Cocoon Shall explores navigating death through the prism of faith and spirituality. Thien reveals in his debut scene that he’s not a religious or spiritual person, that his mind won’t let him be, and that belief is ambiguous. But the sudden death of his sister-in-law, coupled with a newfound urge to find her lost husband (his brother), sets him on a journey through the Vietnamese countryside and his old hometown in which he encounters various characters – particularly the old woman, the old man, and the good Samaritan on the road – who cause him to reconsider God’s presence and how faith and goodness can motivate people. But at the same time, he’s puzzled why a higher power would so unfairly make his nephew an orphan and take the life of his sister-in-law, a practicing Christian.

(Spoilers ahead) Much remains unresolved by the conclusion, and the film’s title is open to interpretation, without any clear reference. Thien never finds his brother Tam. We’re also not sure if our protagonist feels any spiritual clarity after his many journeys. But the message is clear: This is a story about reconciling with one’s past. Thien reconnects with his former love, Thao, who has become a nun; the flashback between them reveals that he experiences unresolved longing and romantic feelings for Thao, who eventually comes to peace with her choice. Likewise, Thien searches for his long-lost brother, the father of his orphaned nephew, hoping to reunite and learn why he ran away. His journeys lead him back to his hometown and kindle a nostalgic sentiment.

Sometimes asking questions is more important than finding answers. Again, Thien never locates his brother or experiences a spiritual epiphany that we can clearly identify. But by being forced to revisit his roots, assume responsibility for his young nephew, and try to better understand his former lover and her choices, we can hope that he’s on the path to finding purpose and fulfillment in life and seeking deeper spiritual truths.

Similar works

  • Other films within the “slow cinema” subgenre, include:
  • The works of Apichatpong Weerasethakul and Terrence Malick
  • Jeanne Dielman, 23 Quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles (1975) – A landmark of slow cinema, meticulously depicting a widow’s repetitive daily routine, highlighting the mundane and unspoken
  • Mirror (1975) –Tarkovsky’s poetic, autobiographical film using nonlinear storytelling to explore memory, family, and time through meditative visuals
  • Stalker (1979) –Tarkovsky’s philosophical sci-fi journey with long, contemplative sequences, delving into existential and spiritual themes
  • Sátántangó (1994) – A seven-hour epic portraying the bleak, monotonous lives of villagers on a decaying Hungarian collective farm
  • Taste of Cherry (1997) – A minimalist Iranian film exploring life, death, and personal choice through quiet, meditative storytelling
  • Eternity and a Day (1998) – A dreamlike Greek film by Theo Angelopolous blending flashbacks and slow pacing to reflect on memory, loss, and time’s passage
  • Werckmeister Harmonies (2000) – A haunting black-and-white film with long takes and an unsettling atmosphere, reflecting on societal decay
  • Goodbye, Dragon Inn (2003) – A meditative portrayal of a grand movie theater’s final night, focusing on its ghostly, near-empty ambiance.
  • Uncle Boonmee Who Can Recall His Past Lives (2010) – A surreal, dreamlike tale of a dying man visited by ghosts as he contemplates his past lives
  • An Elephant Sitting Still (2018) – Hu Bo, A profoundly melancholic film following the intersecting lives of lonely, struggling individuals in a bleak Chinese city

Other films by Pham Thien An

  • The Mute (short, 2018)
  • Stay Awake, Be Ready (short, 2019)

Read more...

A Kiwi comedy about kinship

Tuesday, April 1, 2025

Peter Jackson’s Tolkien adaptations aren’t the only quality cinematic exports of note from New Zealand in recent years. A lesser-known Kiwi gem, released in 2016, is Hunt for the Wilderpeople, an adventure comedy/drama directed and written by Taika Waititi and adapted from Barry Crump’s novel Wild Pork and Watercress. One of these “wilderpersons” is Ricky Baker (Julian Dennison), a misfit foster child who is sent to live with Bella (Rima Te Wiata) and Hec Faulkner (Sam Neill) in the remote countryside. When Bella unexpectedly dies, authorities threaten to take Ricky back into state care, prompting him to flee into the wilderness. Hec, his gruff and reluctant guardian, follows in an attempt to bring him home, but the situation spirals out of control as the two inadvertently become fugitives, triggering a nationwide manhunt. Paula (Rachel House), the overzealous child welfare officer, becomes determined to track them down, leading to a wild and comedic chase through the rugged New Zealand bush.

To listen to a recording of our CineVerse group discussion of Hunt for the Wilderpeople, conducted last week, click here.


Celebrated for its seamless mix of humor and heartfelt storytelling, the film pairs breathtaking landscapes with an eccentric yet deeply moving tale of friendship and self-discovery. The chemistry between actors Neill and Dennison is palpable, crucial for viewers to believe in their unlikely pairing. Neill's veteran presence lends thespian gravitas to a film that might otherwise be perceived as less serious. Fortunately, Wilderpeople avoids maudlin tendencies, excessive sentimentality, and the portrayal of Ricky as an overly precocious or cloying child character.

While the film’s comedic sensibilities occasionally veer into eye-rolling silliness, as evidenced by Paula and Andy’s Keystone-cop-like bumbling, most of the laughs are well-earned and surprisingly funny, particularly in the priest’s eulogy scene for Bella, Ricky’s references to the "skux life," his overconfidence in his hunting skills, and Hector’s use of the word "majestical."

Hunt for the Wilderpeople neatly fits into multiple subgenres: road movie, buddy picture, quirky comedy, coming-of-age story, and touching family drama. The film's chaptered structure, combined with its often over-the-top comedy and side characters—such as Paula, Andy, and Psycho Sam—gives it a distinct storybook fantasy feel. As Angie Han of Slash Film observes, "Wilderpeople isn't a fantasy, per se, but it's grounded in the same sort of exaggerated kid logic that guides children's stories like 'James and the Giant Peach' and 'Matilda'…the entire movie feels like a children's book come to life." She also notes, " Wilderpeople feels like a throwback to '80s adventure films in some ways, but it mostly just feels like a new childhood classic…It’s not tough to imagine kids falling this movie today and feeling nostalgic about it 10 or 20 years down the line, the way Millennials and Gen Xers today wax rhapsodic about The Goonies.”

On that note of nostalgia, consider how the film possesses a retro aesthetic, thanks to director Taika Waititi's use of grandiose helicopter and drone shots, crash zooms, 360-degree pans, and rugged mobile camera work during chase sequences. Additionally, Wilderpeople features a diverse and eclectic soundtrack, incorporating old and new music from artists like DD Smash, Nina Simone, Leonard Cohen, the Bolshoi Children's Choir, Moniker, and the Alessi Brothers.

We can easily read this movie as a moral on adventuring as a means of processing grief: Hector and Ricky, both devastated by Bella’s death, embark on an escape, allowing them to express painful feelings and memories and forge an emotional bond. But it’s also a robust rumination on nonconformist clans, demonstrating that loving families come in various forms. Bella and Hector’s unconventional acceptance of Ricky into their household, Hector’s eventual father-figure role, Kahu and her father’s compassionate support, and Psycho Sam’s kindness all illustrate this.

Hunt for the Wilderpeople demonstrates the “opposites attract” truism, too, serving as a platonic love story between Ricky and Hector – who, despite their stark differences, form a connection through shared experiences. And we’re reminded, of course, that necessity is the mother of invention, as demonstrated by how Ricky and Hector are forced to improvise in the bush and adapt to their circumstances. Ironically, Ricky’s resourcefulness becomes crucial when Hector is injured.

Similar works

  • Paper Moon (1973) – A con artist and a clever young girl travel the Depression-era Midwest, pulling small-time scams.
  • On Golden Pond (1981) – Another unconventional relationship between an older man and a young adolescent in a rural location.
  • Where the Wild Things Are (2009) – A lonely boy escapes to an island of creatures reflecting his emotions and struggles.
  • Up (2009) – A widower and an eager boy scout embark on a balloon-powered adventure to South America.
  • Moonrise Kingdom (2012) – Two young lovers run away together, prompting a quirky island-wide search.
  • Captain Fantastic (2016) – A father raising his kids off-grid must reintegrate them into society after a family tragedy.
  • The Peanut Butter Falcon (2019) – A runaway with Down syndrome and a drifter form an unlikely bond while chasing their dreams.

Other films by Taika Waititi

  • Boy (2010)
  • What We Do in the Shadows (2014)
  • Thor: Ragnarok (2017)
  • Jojo Rabbit (2019)

Read more...

Shoeless and somewhat clueless

Wednesday, March 26, 2025

One of Hollywood's most unconventional romantic dramas from its golden age, The Barefoot Contessa (1954), written and directed by Joseph L. Mankiewicz and starring Ava Gardner, Humphrey Bogart, and Edmond O'Brien, tells the story of Maria Vargas (Gardner), a Spanish nightclub dancer who achieves Hollywood stardom but remains constrained by the expectations of the men surrounding her. The film's narrative unfolds through the perspectives of three men: Harry Dawes (Bogart), the seasoned director who discovers Maria; Oscar Muldoon (O'Brien), the fast-talking, cynical press agent instrumental in shaping her public image; and the aristocratic Count Vincenzo Torlato-Favrini (Rossano Brazzi), whose love offers hope yet ultimately leads to tragedy. The story explores Maria's relationships with powerful men, including the controlling businessman Alberto Bravano (Marius Goring), and her struggle to attain personal freedom despite her fame and beauty.

To listen to a recording of our CineVerse group discussion of The Barefoot Contessa, recorded last week, click here.


The film's unpredictable and offbeat nature is, at times, refreshing, and at others, frustrating. For instance, The Barefoot Contessa offers a privileged yet pessimistic glimpse into Hollywood insiders and the star-making system, yet the narrative curiously unfolds primarily in Italy, Spain, and France, not Hollywood. Secondly, despite top billing for Bogart and Gardner, their characters maintain a strictly platonic relationship. Thirdly, the filmmakers introduce Maria unconventionally; instead of seeing her dance, we observe a room of men captivated by her offscreen performance.

The film's central theme is the dark side of celebrity and fame. It reveals the inner workings of the Hollywood system, where powerful men discover and cultivate new talent, transforming beautiful women into stars, yet they clash for control, stifling these women's choices and freedom. New Yorker critic Richard Brody observed: “(Mankiewicz) shows the sordidness of the money-driven, ego-fuelled, ruthless machinations that are both central to the business of Hollywood and constantly threaten to derail it. And he contemplates with a lofty, rueful view (that owed nothing to the Hays Code) the cruelly unjust price that women in Hollywood paid for their sexual and personal freedom, the tragic conflicts that they endured for their resolute independence.”

The male gaze is prominent throughout the film. Maria is consistently objectified by the men around her, and her story is told primarily through their perspectives. We consistently see and hear her through the eyes and words of the men who admired her. Consider the courtroom scene where Maria testifies on her father’s behalf; we hear a summary of the proceedings through Oscar's narration.

The movie serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of putting someone on a pedestal. The Count commissions a statue of Maria, symbolizing his worship of her beauty and elegance. However, no human is a perfect physical specimen or deity deserving of unquestioned adulation. Maria, though uniquely lovely, is an imperfect human being who cannot be "preserved in stone" or controlled by any man. Similarly, the film reinforces the impossibility of truly knowing and understanding another person. The fact that The Barefoot Contessa is told via flashbacks from the perspectives of three different men, each with their own interpretation of Maria’s personality and character, underscores her complexity and unpredictability.

Like many memorable romantic dramas, this work explores the dichotomy between romantic illusion and sobering reality. Maria yearns for true love, happiness, and sexual freedom, but her relationships are doomed by circumstances and societal expectations. She maintains her free spirit, resisting conformity, but ultimately faces tragic consequences for her choices.

Yet, despite these thematic achievements, the picture may leave some audiences unsatisfied, with several questions unresolved (spoilers ahead):
  • Why does Maria so quickly and impulsively leave with these men, particularly Count Vincenzo, Alberto, and Harry/Kirk? What motivates her hasty actions?
  • Why does Bogart’s character disappear for most of the second half, including a full 30 minutes after the midpoint?
  • Why did Vincenzo not inform Maria of his impotence before asking her to marry him and continue his family line?
  • Why did Maria not ask Vincenzo if he would accept her conceiving a child with another man to continue his lineage? Is this not a flawed plan?
  • Why is Harry not more emotionally devastated and angry at Vincenzo when Maria is killed?
  • Why is Vincenzo permitted to attend the funeral of his deceased wife, whom he murdered?
  • What’s up with the film's bizarre original poster, depicting Maria embraced by an amorphous, monstrous figure (shown above)?
Two fascinating trivia tidbits: Maria’s character and story are loosely based on Rita Hayworth, a former Latin dancer who became a star and was widely desired (although reports also suggest the role drew inspiration from actress Anne Chevalier and Ava Gardner herself). O'Brien was the film's sole Academy Award winner, receiving Best Supporting Actor. Notably, he is also the only actor named Oscar to win an Oscar.

Similar works

  • Citizen Kane (1941), especially with the multiple flashbacks recollecting on the dead titular character
  • The Bad and the Beautiful (1952)
  • The Valley of the Dolls (1967)
  • A Star Is Born (1954) – A tale of fame, love, and tragedy in the film industry, starring Judy Garland and James Mason.
  • La Dolce Vita (1960) – Federico Fellini’s masterpiece about celebrity culture and the emptiness of fame in Rome.
  • Gilda (1946) – A glamorous and tragic film noir starring Rita Hayworth, featuring themes of passion, betrayal, and power.
  • My Last Duchess, a poem by Robert Browning

Other films by Joseph L Mankiewicz

  • A Letter to Three Wives (1949)
  • House of Strangers (1949)
  • No Way Out (1950)
  • All About Eve (1950)
  • People Will Talk (1951)
  • Julius Caesar (1953)
  • Guys and Dolls (1955)
  • Cleopatra (1963)
  • Sleuth (1972)

Read more...

Green Border, red flags

Thursday, March 20, 2025

From Schindler’s List to 12 Years a Slave, some films based on atrocious events in human history prove difficult to watch, challenging viewers with realistic violence and disturbing subject matter. A more recent example is Green Border (2023), a powerful drama that captures the struggles of refugees trapped between Belarus and Poland in 2021. The story follows a Syrian family—Bashir (Jalal Altawil), his wife Amina (Dalia Naous), their children, and Bashir’s father (Mohamad Al Rashi)—as they attempt to reach Sweden, crossing paths with Leila (Behi Djanati Atai), an Afghan teacher also seeking asylum. Meanwhile, Julia (Maja Ostaszewska), a Polish psychologist turned activist, and conflicted border guard Jan (Tomasz Włosok) provide additional perspectives on the humanitarian crisis. Directed by Agnieszka Holland and filmed in stark black-and-white – which adds a sheen of newsy authenticity, shadowy weight, and thematic gravitas to the story and the characters – this work is notable for its gripping performances and unflinching critique of political exploitation, sparking significant discussion on human rights and remains a vital work in contemporary cinema.

To listen to a recording of our CineVerse group discussion of Green Border, conducted last week, click here.


Green Border is segmented into four different chapters. Part one focuses primarily on a Muslim family, represented by three different generations, seeking escape from Syria but being turned into political hot potatoes by countries they thought would be sympathetic to their plight. The second chapter focuses primarily on Jan, an expectant father who participates in the despicable treatment of the displaced foreigners but who resultantly suffers a crisis of conscience. Part three follows a colorful band of activists, including new convert Julia, who strategize to bring aid to these political victims. The brief epilogue covers how millions of Ukrainian refugees are granted asylum or temporary protection in Poland and across Europe. Chapters 2 and 3 are particularly important, as are the characters of Julia and Janek, who stand as surrogates for the audience: witnesses to the ruthless way these migrants are treated who, like viewers, may be motivated to get involved.

Set in 2021 to 2022, and released only a year later, Green Border has a political zeitgeist feeling of urgency and immediacy, bringing attention to a serious humanitarian crisis that has actually been going on for the past 10 years. The European migrant crisis began in 2015 with large numbers of refugees from conflict zones like Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, and later Africa, arriving in Eastern European countries such as Hungary, Poland, and Bulgaria. More recently, the crisis intensified with Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, displacing over 7 million Ukrainians, while the Belarus-EU migrant crisis in 2021 further exacerbated the region's challenges. American viewers may be less aware of this ongoing problem on the other side of the globe, but Green Border’s setting and troubling narrative also coincide with the ongoing debate in the U.S. over illegal immigrants and how they are being rounded up and deported today.

The Guardian’s Peter Bradshaw described it as “a sombre, yet gripping movie in what feels like two separate genres: a movie about the eastern front in the second world war, or the first world war, or perhaps an entirely different, futurist film: a post-apocalyptic drama in which the forest is the site of some frantic survival-struggle experienced by people whose humanity has been almost entirely stripped from them, as if by some nuclear blast or germ warfare strike…Green Border is a tough watch: a punch to the solar plexus. But a vital bearing of cinematic witness to what is happening in Europe right now.”

At its core, the film thematically explores the heartless and inhumane playing of political pawns. Bashir and his multi-generational family, as well as all the other refugees we observe alongside them, are powerless pieces on a chessboard being played by Belarus and Poland. The Belarus-Poland border crisis is part of a broader geopolitical struggle involving Belarus, Russia, the EU, and NATO, with tensions escalating due to Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko’s close ties with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Since 2021, Belarus has been accused of deliberately funneling migrants—mainly from the Middle East and Africa—toward the EU as retaliation for sanctions, a tactic seen as hybrid warfare aimed at destabilizing Europe while diverting attention from Russia’s war in Ukraine. With Putin backing Lukashenko, Poland has responded by militarizing its border and pushing back the refugees dropped onto its borders by Belarus.

Additionally, the movie examines the courage needed to commit to an ethical cause for the right reasons. There’s an exchange in Green Border where one of the activists criticizes passive liberals for only wanting to help refugees to soothe their sense of guilt. By depicting Julia’s transition from concerned observer to risk-taking activist and depicting Janek’s inner moral conflict at being at first a callous border soldier contributing to the cruelty but later a silent resister to the established order by not apprehending Bashir’s family-in-hiding, Holland is attempting to motivate viewers to think beyond good intentions and well wishes and become more proactive in this humanitarian crisis.

Viewers see evidence of the immense value inherent in even small gestures of care and kindness. Julia and her fellow activists bring food, clothing, medicine, comfort, and advice to the hapless migrants. While they are not able to legally shield them from the Polish border police, the supplies and treatment they provide give these sufferers hope, even temporarily, in a mostly hopeless situation.

That infusion of positivity is important. “Holland‘s bruisingly powerful new refugee drama ultimately comes from a place of optimism,” per Variety critic Jessica Kiang. “It is optimistic to expect and to nurture a reaction of potentially motivating outrage, when you portray the brutality of which human individuals, at the behest of human institutions, are capable. It is optimistic to believe that, faced with extraordinary cruelty, a viewer’s ordinary decency will be compelled to rise and rebel. Green Border…wraps its social critique in the razor wire of punchy, intelligent cinematic craft in order to elicit precisely such emotions. If we can feel the horror, perhaps there is hope.”

Green Border also reminds us that refugees are human beings, each with unique needs and personalities. Migrants and expatriates seeking asylum and sanctuary deserve dignity and have human rights that shouldn’t be violated, even if they are technically breaking the law. With so many countries in chaos and sociopolitical conflict growing, the immigration crisis is increasingly complex and warrants further rational dialogue, even if it ultimately means that that person isn’t legally allowed entry into their chosen country of migration.


Similar works

  • El Norte (1983) – A poignant drama about two Guatemalan siblings fleeing civil war and attempting to build a new life in the United States.
  • In This World (2002) – A documentary-style drama following two Afghan refugees on a perilous journey from Pakistan to the UK.
  • Babel (2006) – A multi-narrative drama exploring global interconnectedness, including the plight of an undocumented immigrant.
  • Welcome (2009) – A French film about an Iraqi-Kurdish teenager trying to cross the English Channel to reunite with his girlfriend.
  • Mediterranea (2015) – A gripping film following two African migrants as they navigate the dangers of illegal immigration to Italy.
  • The Other Side of Hope (2017) – A Finnish film by Aki Kaurismäki, blending humor and drama in the story of a Syrian refugee seeking asylum in Helsinki.
  • Human Flow (2017) – Ai Weiwei’s documentary about the global refugee crisis, showcasing the struggles and resilience of displaced people worldwide.
  • Quo Vadis, Aida? (2020) – A harrowing drama about the 1995 Srebrenica massacre, told through the perspective of a UN translator trying to save her family.
  • Io Capitano (2023) – A powerful Italian film about two Senegalese teenagers who embark on a perilous journey to Europe, facing exploitation and danger along the way.

Other films by Agnieszka Holland

  • Europa Europa
  • Total Eclipse
  • The Secret Garden
  • In Darkness
  • Charlatan
  • Spoor
  • Mr. Jones
  • Angry Harvest

Read more...

Answer me these questions three

Sunday, March 16, 2025


What’s the greatest British comedy ever made? What film persists as perhaps the most re-quoted by fans over the past 50 years? And what work is primarily responsible for most of the world coming to know and love Graham Chapman, John Cleese, Eric Idle, Terry Gilliam, Michael Palin and Terry Jones? 

The answer to all these questions is, of course, Monty Python and the Holy Grail, released 50 years ago this month. Co-directed by two of the Pythons – Gilliam and Jones –the movie takes a satirical buzzsaw to the legend of King Arthur and his Knights of the Round Table, chronicling their bizarre and often ridiculous journey to locate the titular golden chalice. Along the way, Arthur (played by Chapman) and his faithful band encounter a series of absurd obstacles, including the stubborn Black Knight (Cleese), the peculiar Knights Who Say "Ni" (led by Palin), the ferocious Rabbit of Caerbannog, and a bridgekeeper with a penchant for, let’s say, difficult questions. The cast members take on multiple roles, with Cleese portraying Sir Lancelot, Palin as Sir Galahad, Jones as Sir Bedevere, and Idle as Sir Robin.

Click here to listen to a recording of our CineVerse group discussion of this film, conducted earlier this month. To hear the March Cineversary podcast episode celebrating Holy Grail’s 50th anniversary, click here.


Holy Grail, due in large part to its limited resources and shoestring budget (amazingly, it was financed in part by members of Pink Floyd, Led Zeppelin, Jethro Tull, and Genesis because the Pythons lacked financial backers), wasn’t afraid to defy audience expectations for a heroic adventure, historical costume drama, or feature-length satire, often deviating wildly from film storytelling formula and traditional comedy approaches.

The movie, which functions more as a series of gags and sketch pieces loosely strung together by a thin plot, didn’t balk at irritating its audience with the unexpected, including silly credits and Swedish subtitles, crudely animated interstitials, a phony intermission title card, an abrupt unresolved ending, and the absence of credits at the end. It had the guts to make fun of its ultra-low budget and employ edgy animation to depict otherwise unfilmable scenes, yet it still achieves a visually realistic look with its period-accurate costumes and props, dirty aesthetics, and authentic castle settings (thanks to its being shot on location in Scotland).

The comedy is absurd, silly, and random, mixing metaphors while managing to offend multiple groups equally, including the religious, the royal, the ignorant, the politically minded, the class/caste system, homosexuals, and women. It also defies the rules of classic narrative structure by having characters talk to the camera and its medieval universe unexpectedly invaded by 20th-century characters – namely a contemporary detective and two bobbies, whose reappearance becomes a crucial repeated joke.

Interestingly, the Grail itself functions as a Hitchcockian McGuffin – a device that motivates the characters but is never seen or obtained, further upending our expectations.

Per Alternate Ending essayist Timothy Brayton, Holy Grail “provided an excellent vehicle for the dominant form of comedy in the Pythons' work, the aggressively weird conceptual gags in which something inordinately surreal plunges right on through a normal environment, generally leaving the characters inside that environment quite baffled and upset. Generally speaking, the group's favorite target for their absurd sensibilities were the most staid and English of situations…its travesty, satire, and parody are well-augmented by the precision of its surrealism, which only seems random. In fact, the film carefully builds up a series of comic motifs and call-backs, giving the whole thing a rather elegant structure that gives all of the jokes a feeling of inevitability even as they seem spectacularly random.”

DVD Savant critic Glenn Erickson wrote that the film “withstands the weight of its own jolly pointlessness by virtue of a series of self-reflexive jokes aimed at deflating the pomposity of the epic movie format.” Reflect, for instance, on how the rousing score serves as an ironic musical bed for the silly situations, drab settings, and cowardly or unheroic actions of the protagonists.

Holy Grail also earns points as a comedy that feels contemporary, despite its 50-year vintage, because it’s so self-aware and meta, often joking about its low production values with lines like “It’s only a model” in reference to the image of a grand castle off in the distance.

It’s further deserving of celebration because it remains among the most quoted films of all time. Fans across the globe continue to mimic some of its most famous lines, including “We are the Knights who say ‘Ni!’” “Bring out your dead!” “I’m not dead yet!” “Help! Help! I’m being repressed!” “It’s just a flesh wound.” “On second thought, let’s not go to Camelot. It is a silly place.” “None shall pass!” and “Your mother was a hamster, and your father smelt of elderberries!”

This work is also worthy of kudos because it continues to rank highly as one of the greatest comedies ever created. In 2000, readers of Total Film magazine ranked Monty Python and the Holy Grail as the fifth-greatest comedy film of all time. In 2006, a Channel 4 poll of British viewers placed Holy Grail sixth on the list of the 50 Greatest Comedy Films. In 2011, an ABC and People magazine poll revealed that Holy Grail was the second-best comedy of all time, behind Airplane!. And in 2016, Empire magazine ranked Holy Grail 18th on its list of the 100 Best British Films.

What is it about the Python sense of humor and comic sensibilities that made Holy Grail so successful? Monty Python’s brand of comedy was characterized by its dry, British-style wit, often delivered in a deadpan manner that enhances the funniness through understatement and irony. Their humor was irreverent, satirical, surreal, and absurd, frequently challenging conventional comedic structures and defying expectations with bizarre, nonsensical, and unexpected punchlines. The group consisted of a small, all-male troupe – John Cleese, Terry Gilliam, Terry Jones, Michael Palin, Graham Chapman, and Eric Idle – with its six members frequently playing multiple roles, often in exaggerated and deliberately unconvincing ways.

Their sketches and films featured satirical songs, which mock societal norms, historical events, and political issues with catchy tunes and darkly comedic lyrics. Case in point: the Knights of the Round Table tune and the snarky minstrel’s Bravely Bold Sir Robin ballads. The sextet also enjoyed subverting established canon or assumed characteristics. So instead of Bedivere the Wise, Brave Sir Robin, or Galahad the Chaste we get Bedivere the dunderhead, Robin the runaway, and Galahad the sexual opportunist.

A signature element of their comedy was the mixing of metaphors, such as blending a murder mystery or police procedural with a medieval action story or inserting 20th-century political issues—like repression and voting—into a medieval setting, creating anachronistic and highly satirical humor.

Like other comedy masters, the Pythons employed running gags for maximum comic effect, as evidenced by characters repeatedly saying they’re “not dead yet,” repeated mentions of swallows and shrubberies, Arthur consistently confusing the number 3 for 5, the darkly humorous lyrics of Sir Robin’s minstrel, the recurrent violence against shrieking cats, or the cowardly retreats continually made by Arthur’s supposedly valiant group.

The Pythons frequently played with gender roles and stereotypes, using cross-dressing and exaggerated performances to lampoon societal norms and expectations. We see, for example, Terry Jones playing a peasant woman, and John Cleese chewing the scenery as an insulting French Taunter.

Their humor could also be described as random and anarchic, often featuring abrupt scene transitions, unexpected fourth-wall breaks, ridiculous title credits, a sudden “Intermission” title card, and deliberately nonsensical plot developments. They regularly used speech impediments as comedic devices, too, exaggerating accents or lisps to create absurd characters.

Additionally, the Pythons frequently spoofed violence, warfare, barbarism, and Christianity-fueled carnage, using exaggerated brutality and slapstick-style gore to highlight the absurdity of historical and modern conflicts. Recall the Black Knight, who’s left with four bloodied stumps after his limbs are hacked off by Arthur, or the stuffy religious ritualism that prefaces the use of the Holy Hand Grenade.

Their work included head-trippy, psychedelic, two-dimensional animation as well, most famously created by Gilliam, which linked sketches together with surreal, often grotesque or crude imagery, such as the cartoon trumpeters who use their posteriors to play their instruments.

Embracing low-budget opportunism, Monty Python made clever use of simple props, costumes, and settings, commonly turning limitations into comedic strengths. Exhibit A: The simple syncopated clapping of two coconut shells and actors pantomiming a horse trot substituted for the lack of real horses which the filmmakers could not afford. Exhibit B: Gilliam’s madcap cartoonery depicting characters and escapades, such as the Black Beast of Aaargh or God appearing in the heavens, that otherwise would have required costly and elaborate special effects.

In an Uproxx essay, writer Matt Prigg posited: “After Holy Grail, the flood gates opened. It’s the movie that every sketch comedy troupe aspires to make, from Cheech and Chong to Kids in the Hall, from Broken Lizard to SNL. Wet Hot American Summer, Mo’ Money, and Run Ronnie Run owe it their lives as well. Even movies that are simply sketches, with no story, like The Kentucky Fried Movie, only exist because Python made it safe for sketch comedy troupes to invade the big screen, and you might as well throw the Muppets in there, too…It’s not hard to imagine Grail being a watershed movie for those into gory horror-comedies — people like Sam Raimi, the late Stuart Gordon, Peter Jackson, Edgar Wright, who must have thought this PG-rated comedy was onto something.”

Ponder that Saturday Night Live, the definitive American TV sketch comedy show, debuted just a few months after Holy Grail’s release and less than a year after the Flying Circus television show ended its five-year run.

Additionally, ruminate on how few British feature films before Monty Python and the Holy Grail were widely accepted by Americans. There were Ealing comedies like The Lavender Hill Mob (1951) and The Ladykillers (1955), the Richard Lester musical comedies A Hard Day’s Night (1964) and Help! (1965) starring the Beatles, and Bedazzled (1967) with Dudley Moore and Peter Cook, but little else.

Following Holy Grail, America and the world benefited from a plethora of British film comedies, including two more Python features – The Life of Brian (1979), and The Meaning of Life (1983) – as well as A Fish Called Wanda (1988), Four Weddings and a Funeral (1994), The Full Monty (1997), Notting Hill (1999), Edgar Wright pictures like Shaun of the Dead (2004) and Hot Fuzz (2007), Nick Park stop-motion animated films like Chicken Run (2000) and Wallace & Gromit: Curse of the Were-Rabbit (2005), and the live-action animated Paddington movies (2014 and 2017), among many others.

Holy Grail’s pervasive reach can also be traced across several other works, as well, including pictures directed by Gilliam that showcase flawed heroic quests and compromised heroes like Jabberwocky (1977), Time Bandits (1981), The Adventures of Baron Munchausen (1989), The Fisher King (1991), The Brothers Grimm (2005), and The Man Who Killed Don Quixote (2018); Terry Jones’s Erik the Viking (1989), which also continues this tradition of imperfect heroes; History of the World Part I (1981) – Mel Brooks’ irreverent historical sendup appears to be an obvious descendent; This Is Spinal Tap (1984), in which Rob Reiner borrows Holy Grail's deadpan delivery and absurdist humor while also mimicking its low-budget aesthetic to blur the line between satire and reality; The Princess Bride (1987), Reiner’s parody of fantasy and adventure tropes that shares Holy Grail's playful medieval satire, subverting traditional heroic tales with comedic battle scenes, absurd dialogue, and a similar "None shall pass!" moment; Life is Cheap...But Toilet Paper is Expensive (1989) a surrealistic indie that embraces Holy Grail's surreal and chaotic humor, using no-frills filmmaking as a comedic device much like Monty Python did; Army of Darkness (1992), in which Sam Raimi parodies medieval epics with exaggerated slapstick, absurd anachronisms, and a bumbling hero reminiscent of Python’s take on King Arthur; Shrek (2001), which mocks fairy tale tropes with dry British wit, anachronistic humor, comedic songs, and absurd characters, much like Holy Grail did with Arthurian legend; Your Highness (2011), a film that follows Holy Grail's irreverent approach to knights and quests, replacing dry wit with crude humor while keeping the self-aware, anachronistic dialogue; Deadpool (2016), A superhero flick that channels Holy Grail's comedic style by frequently breaking the fourth wall and showcasing comedic gore; and Disenchantment (2018), Matt Groening’s animated series, which takes place in a medieval fantasy kingdom and owes more than a tip of the cap to Holy Grail. And Monty Python and the Holy Grail also fueled the creation of the Broadway musical Spamalot, with lyrics by Eric Idle, which enjoyed significant success and one multiple Tony Awards including Best Musical.

Predecessors that may have inspired the Python players include Spike Milligan and the Goon Show, the 1967 movie Camelot, and the 1974 film Lancelot of the Lake. Additionally, Holy Grail gives subtle nods to earlier movies that likely inspired the Pythons, among them Duck Soup (particularly its “We’re Going To War” song, elements of which seep into the Camelot number); The Wizard of Oz (recall how the imposing leader of the Knights who say Ni terrifies Arthur’s band and requests that they bring him a shrubbery, much like the Wizard asks Dorothy and company to fetch him the broomstick of the Wicked Witch of the West); The Seventh Seal by Bergman (which also depicts flagellation and a witch-burning and includes Swedish subtitles in the opening credits); and Ivan the Terrible Part I (Prince Herbert is an effeminate, dim-witted royal forced into an unwanted marriage, similar to Prince Vladimir from the Sergei Eisenstein film).

Several giants in comedy have credited the Pythons with significantly inspiring or impressing them. Martin Short said: ''Their influence was that absurdity in character could replace the punchline, the ba-dum-bum thing.'' Per Tommy Chong, ''They were the first to really show the world how funny men dressed as women could look.'' Tina Fey remarked: ''Sketch endings are overrated. Their key was to do something as long as it was funny and then just stop and do something else.'' Simpsons creator Matt Groening said: ''I just saw this streak in British humor of whimsical surrealism with just a hint of cruelty, and I found that incredibly appealing.'' He said he was motivated by Monty Python's "high-velocity sense of the absurd and not stopping to explain yourself." And SNL alum Mike Myers declared: ''Everything I've ever done can be distilled to at least one Python sketch. If comedy had a periodic element table, Python would have more than one atom on it.''

Believe it or not, it’s possible for a film as ridiculous as Monty Python and the Holy Grail to have themes. For starters, it’s hard to ignore the overall Python pessimism about human beings and their innate stupidity, pomposity, cruelty, and barbarism, which has been demonstrated throughout history. “Grail is as funny as a movie can get, but it is also a tough-minded picture – as outraged about the human propensity for violence as it is outrageous in its attack on that propensity,” according to the late film critic Richard Schickel.

In tandem with this thought, Holy Grail also emphasizes the unjust subjugation and suffering of the lower classes. We hear the peasants say: “Help! Help! I’m being repressed!" "We’re all individuals!" "I didn’t vote for you!" "You can’t expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you!"

Perhaps the biggest message gleaned from all this absurdity is that there are no sacred cows: Even venerated legendary characters like King Arthur and his knights, as well as their gallant quest, are fair game for farce. Holy Grail suggests an inherent fallacy in classical heroism and skewers the assumption that ancient monarchs and their loyal chevaliers were chivalrous, honorable, morally righteous, spiritually motivated, or ordained by the Almighty. 

The golden gift of the grail may have eluded King Arthur and his knights in this impish iteration of the myth, but the quest to thoroughly amuse its audience is undoubtedly achieved by Chapman, Cleese, Gilliam, Idle, Jones, and Palin, and that represents this work’s most plentiful present to viewers. The absurd and irreverent lens through which the Pythons view this legend, and the irrepressibly hilarious way they weave contemporary culture into a quasi-haughty narrative – cleverly placing banana peels along the path from Camelot and consequently tripping up the self-important, sanctimonious, and simpleminded – never fails to entertain. No rewatch is wasted, as the troupe has carefully constructed the comedy with multiple layers of mirth that can be peeled back and re-appreciated or freshly discovered. Many of the jokes effortlessly land a perfect bullseye on the first viewing. But umpteenth watches can yield unexpected yuks that you probably missed, like the chicken image on Sir Robin’s shield, the fact that the stream the Black Knight is guarding is tiny and can easily be crossed without using the bridge, the old man among the crowd with shaving cream on his face, the “with special extra thanks to” opening credits signed by Richard Nixon, the mustache on the face of the sun symbol worn by Arthur, and the sudden reanimation of the wedding guests killed by Lancelot in Swamp Castle who break out into song with the rest of the throng. Holy Grail appeals to the lowbrow, the highbrow, and all brows in between with unbridled zaniness, witty satire, physical comedy that defies physics, and cutting politico-cultural commentary one minute and fart jokes the next. It’s a grand bouillabaisse of clownery with special English herbs and spices, and more than a handful of spam thrown in for good measure, that make for an endlessly fulfilling feast of funniness.

Read more...

Cineversary podcast celebrates 50th anniversary of Monty Python and the Holy Grail

Thursday, March 13, 2025

In Cineversary podcast episode #80, host ⁠Erik Martin⁠ lifts a golden chalice to toast the golden anniversary of Monty Python and the Holy Grail, directed by Terry Gilliam and Terry Jones. Joining him on this quest is Darl Larsen, a film and animation professor at Brigham Young University and author of A Book About the Film Monty Python and the Holy Grail. Together, they collect several nice and inexpensive shrubberies, decipher obscure Swedish subtitles, and try to convince listeners that they’re not quite dead as they explore why this film still matters 50 years later.
Darl Larsen

To listen to this episode, click here or click the "play" button on the embedded streaming player below. Or, you can stream, download, or subscribe to Cineversary wherever you get your podcasts, including Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

Learn more about the Cineversary podcast at www.cineversary.com and email show comments or suggestions to cineversarypodcast@gmail.com.

Read more...

Fresh blood in a tired subgenre

Tuesday, March 4, 2025

Imagine a vampire movie in which bloodsucking takes a backseat, the Gothic castle in East Europe is replaced by a dilapidated Queen Anne-style home in Detroit, and the undead are rockstar hipsters. That pretty much sums up Only Lovers Left Alive, a 2013 film written and directed by Jim Jarmusch that offers a hypnotic and atmospheric take on this horror subgenre. The narrative centers on Adam (Tom Hiddleston), a reclusive and melancholic musician in Detroit, and his centuries-old lover, Eve (Tilda Swinton), who resides in Tangier. As Adam sinks deeper into despair over the state of the modern world, Eve journeys to be with him, rekindling their love and shared reverence for art, history, and human culture. Their tranquil existence is upended by the arrival of Eve’s wild and impulsive younger sister, Ava (Mia Wasikowska), whose reckless behavior throws their world into disarray. John Hurt appears as Christopher Marlowe, a fellow vampire and Eve’s trusted confidant, while Anton Yelchin plays Ian, a mortal who aids Adam in acquiring rare instruments.

To listen to a recording of our CineVerse group discussion of Only Lovers Left Alive, conducted last week, click here.


Jarmusch and his collaborators suffuse the vampire mythos with fresh and fascinating ideas, including vampires as connoisseurs of art, culture, and coolness; vampire soulmates who truly love each other emotionally, intellectually, and physically; world-weary members of the undead who experience ennui and suicidal thoughts; and nosferatu who look upon actual bloodsucking for sustenance as primitive, choosing instead to curate only the finest available supply of intoxicating red corpuscles via the black market.

The concept of undying characters who acquire vast knowledge and appreciation for the true masterminds of science, literature, music, and the arts – and who can also instantly identify modern-day prodigies – is one of the most thought-provoking aspects of Only Lovers Left Alive.

As is true of many Jarmusch movies, not much happens here. This is more a film about the feels, about luxuriating in gothy Bohemian spaces with finely cultured dagger-toothed dandies who happen to be vampires and the artistic and erudite accouterment they prefer surrounding themselves with. The pace is unapologetically languid, but the chill tone, shadowy cinematography, and fully inhabited performances more than make up for a skeletal narrative.

This is less a genre film or horror feature than a romantic character study. Yes, there are forays into vampiric lore, including the need to drink blood and avoid sunlight. And Jarmusch even introduces a new trope in nosferatu mythology: the wearing of leather gloves outside of the vampire’s habitat. However, the horror elements play second fiddle to the fascinating romance dynamic and personality contrasts between Adam and Eve: He’s often clad in black and she in white, suggesting their oppositeness.

Jarmusch was quoted in an interview saying: “Obviously, it’s not a horror movie, as most vampire movies are…I think it’s just the overview that it allowed, because they’ve been alive so long, to show a love story that spans that amount of time… To be able to see their perception of history over long period of times, was really interactive to me. And their own love story, to span that amount of time, was what drew me to it.”

The filmmakers are aware that Adam and Eve are fair game for criticism by viewers as cold and snobbishly unrelatable highbrows; but Ava calling them out on this behavior as she’s kicked out of their home helps defuse this criticism.

What’s Only Lovers Left Alive really about? Societal and cultural decay, of course. This vampire duo represents an enlightened, aristocratic, and elitist pair who, thanks to their immortality, can accurately observe both progress and devolution on Earth. They refer to mortals as “zombies,” the relatively uneducated proletariat who have allowed the world to decline and who don’t appreciate the fine details of nature nor the works of geniuses that history has often overlooked.

But more than that, this is a testament to timeless love and commitment. Adam and Eve have been married since 1868 and remain loyal and devoted to each other, even though they often spend long spans apart separated by continents. They resonate as empathetic romantics who eschew traditional vampire violence, defying the typical trope of the selfish, predatory, and barbaric bloodsucker.

Takeaway #3? Creativity, curiosity, and a thirst for knowledge fuel the drive to survive and thrive. We see how much Eve treasures her favorite books and authors and maintains a wondrous curiosity about even the smallest details in nature, such as mushrooms growing where they shouldn’t be. Adam is motivated by the desire to experiment with music, an inquisitiveness that compels him to seek out and play antique instruments – which suggests that part of the secret to successful innovation is to respect the past and its pioneers. Perhaps what prevents Adam from killing himself with the wooden bullet, besides his love for Eve, is his passion for music.

Slate critic Sharan Shetty believes appreciating Eve is the key to better understanding what he believes is this film’s central tenet: “Jarmusch skeptics may mistake vampire Adam’s incessant odes to dead artists and thinkers as a surrogate for the director’s own high-minded nostalgia. But Only Lovers is not a lament for the way things were; it’s a paean to Eve, to a hope for the future. Swinton’s character is inspiring, her worship of the world all the more surprising because it flows not from a curious child but from a centuries-old creature of the night. She should be more jaded; she is not. She at times seems like the only lover, anywhere, who is actually alive.”

Similar works

  • The Man Who Fell to Earth (1976) – A melancholic, existential sci-fi film starring David Bowie as an alien trapped on Earth
  • The Hunger (1983) – A stylish and melancholic vampire film starring Catherine Deneuve, David Bowie, and Susan Sarandon
  • Wings of Desire (1987) – A poetic film about angels observing human life, capturing a similar longing and detachment
  • Three Colors: Blue (1993), and Three Colors: Red (1994)
  • Let the Right One In (2008) – A haunting and poetic Swedish vampire film about loneliness and connection
  • Thirst (2009) – Park Chan-wook’s dark, sensual, and philosophical take on the vampire myth
  • Byzantium (2012) – a gothic vampire film about two immortal women hiding their past because it threatens their survival
  • Under the Skin (2013) – A slow, eerie sci-fi film starring Scarlett Johansson as an alien hunting humans
  • A Girl Walks Home Alone at Night (2014) – An Iranian black-and-white vampire film with a dreamy, arthouse feel
  • I'm Thinking of Ending Things (2020) – a surreal psychological horror-drama about reality unraveling during a tense visit to a farmhouse

Other films by Jim Jarmusch

  • Stranger Than Paradise (1984)
  • Down by Law (1986)
  • Mystery Train (1989)
  • Night on Earth (1991)
  • Dead Man (1995)
  • Ghost Dog: The Way of the Samurai (1999)
  • Coffee and Cigarettes (2003)
  • Broken Flowers (2005)
  • The Dead Don't Die (2019)

Read more...

  © Blogger template Cumulus by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP