Waitresses have more fun (or do they?)
Thursday, January 16, 2014
Yesterday, CineVerse took a trip in the wayback machine to the mid 1970s, a time of maturation in Hollywood movies and daring new visions from bold young filmmakers, including Martin Scorsese. His "Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore" provoked an absorbing discussion among our members. Here's a recap:
WHAT IS CURIOUS, DIFFERENT AND DISTINCTIVE ABOUT THIS
PICTURE?
It’s a
departure for director Martin Scorsese, well known for making tough guy movies
and mob films; this film showcases his versatility and sensitivity in bringing
out good drama, comedy and strong performances from females, kids and a
well-written script.
The film is
an interesting blend of different genres, including drama, romantic comedy,
road movie, and woman’s picture.
The story and
characters are not easy to predict: the film doesn’t necessarily conclude the
way most would expect, and the ending is unresolved and ambiguous, although
emotionally you could argue there is some closure by the finish.
The movie is
well cast, including heavyweights like Ellyn Burstyn (who won Best Actress
Oscar), Diane Ladd (nominated for her role), Kris Kristofferson (in a role that
put him on the map), Harvey Keitel, and future stars in Jodie Foster and even
Diane Ladd’s daughter Laura Dern. Alfred Lutter, who plays the son, is also
impressive as a precocious 12-year-old.
THE MOVIE HAS HAILED AS A FEMINIST PICTURE BY SOME, AND
CRITICIZED AS NOT ENOUGH OF A FEMINIST STATEMENT BY OTHERS. HOW DOES THIS MOVIE
SUCCEED AND FAIL AS A FEMINIST FILM?
It has the
appearance of a feminist film, with a strong female protagonist, yet it depicts
her as needing the love and attention of a man and possibly failing in her
dream of becoming a singer/entertainer.
The film was
interestingly timed, as it was released at the height of the women’s rights
movement, when feminist issues seeped into politics and culture.
While some
have viewed the film as a feminist film that is positive and supportive in
showcasing a woman’s transformation from a symbol of domesticity to a figure of
autonomy, others have criticized it for being a glorified melodrama/romcom
wherein the female lead can only find happiness and fulfillment by having a
man.
As Roger
Ebert put it: “The movie has been both attacked and defended on feminist
grounds, but I think it belongs somewhere outside ideology, maybe in the area
of contemporary myth and romance. There are times, indeed, when the movie seems
less about Alice than it does about the speculations and daydreams of a lot of
women about her age, who identify with the liberation of other women but are
unsure on the subject of themselves.”
Consider that
Alice doesn’t necessarily realize her dreams of becoming a singer by the end,
and that she pours on the tears in an earlier scene to evoke pity from a bar
owner; this not some Betty Friedan, bra-burning feminist icon. Instead, Alice
has faults and flaws just like any woman or man. And she decides to remain in
Tucson and near David instead of pursuing her dream of going to Monterey and
becoming established as a singer there.
Consider, as
well, the opening scene, with its sepia tones and iconic images we’ve seen in
classic Hollywood films. This appears to be a spoof of the Hollywood dream
vision that many young girls are fed and led to believe can happen to them.
WHAT ARE THE THEMES EXAMINED IN “ALICE”?
The complex
differences between women and men, as exemplified in Alice’s relationships with
the opposite sex.
Arguably, the
most important of these relationships is not between Alice and her boyfriends
but between Alice and her pre-teen boy, who stands alone with her at the end of
the film, as if suggesting that they’ve come to some sort of an agreement and
reached a bond, despite facing a fork in the road ahead.
Interestingly,
she admits later in the movie that she cannot live without a man. It’s telling
that, in the last shot, the only male she’s left standing with is her son,
which underscores his importance in her life as the only real male that
matters.
Scorsese told
one interviewer: “It was a film about self-responsibility and also about how
people make the same mistakes again and again.”
In another
interview, Scorsese said the film is not about Alice and her career, but
instead is concerned with particular real characters living in confusion. Essayist
Russell Davis posited: “For this reason, the picture ends with Alice and Tommy
on the verge of a total mutual understanding, a necessary preliminary to their
successful coping with the world’s chaos.”
DOES THIS MOVIE REMIND YOU OF ANY OTHERS?
An Unmarried
Woman
The Courtship
of Eddie’s Father
Gas Food
Lodging
Tumbleweeds
Waitress