Escape from Palookaville
Thursday, July 3, 2014
Few films come as highly praised and audience beloved as "On the Waterfront." Last night, CineVerse met to hold up the magnifying glass on this 60-year-old gem. Here are the facets we observed:
HOW
WOULD THIS PICTURE HAVE BEEN EYE-OPENING AND INNOVATIVE FOR 1954?
· It, along with
previous recent movies by Kazan and his Actors Studio thespians like Brando,
exemplified a new era of acting that was more emotionally plausible and realistic—a
style that is both “physical and introspective and distinctly more nuanced,
immediate, unpredictable—more truthful—than most acting that preceded it. It’s
the style of poetic realism that informs the great performance,” wrote essayist
Michael Almereyda.
· It woke
Americans up to the unfair conditions suffered by longshoremen working on
American docks where corrupt leaders and politicians prevent them from earning
an honest wage and practice racketeering and extortion; the screenplay is based
on a New York Sun series of expose articles that won the Pulitzer Prize for
reporting in 1949.
· Unlike prior
films noir, crime thrillers, message pictures and heavy dramas, this one
benefitted from hyper-realism in its look and feel: it’s shot in various real
locations in and around Hoboken, N.J., including the docks, bars, rooftops,
alleys and tenement dwellings; it’s filmed during cold weather, so we actually
see the cold vapor breath trails coming from actors’ mouths; it features
handheld camera techniques for heightened verite style filmmaking; the
nighttime scenes are not day for night but night for night, although expressive
horror/noir shadows are often used.
· It’s also a
topical political film that was personally relevant to director Kazan’s life:
in 1952, he agreed to testify before the House Un-American Activities Committee
and name names of friends and colleagues affiliated with the Communist party,
an extremely controversial move that haunted Kazan the rest of his life, but
that he justified as the right thing to do at the time. He saw himself as
personified in the character of Terry, who also has to testify against
oppressive forces to do the right thing. It’s debatable how these two things
can be equitable, but Kazan nevertheless envisioned himself as a martyr-like
outsider who’s forced to make a moral choice, like Terry. Many saw Kazan as
ratting on friends who got blacklisted simply because of their political
beliefs so that Kazan could continue to work in Hollywood—which he did with much
success.
WHAT
THEMES ARE DOMINANT IN “ON THE WATERFRONT”?
· Making the
right ethical choice: Terry is caught in the middle between two opposing
forces—the morally righteous duo of the priest and Edie on one side, and the
cruel, manipulative thugs led by Johnny Friendly on the other. He must decide
whether to protect the evil status quo or inform on them to aid the cause of
their exploited workers.
· The corrupting
nature of power: Johnny Friendly is depicted as having a tough childhood, but
his lust for power has stripped him of any kindness, grace or humility. Even
his overlord, Mr. Upstairs, doesn’t hesitate to drop Johnny when Johnny is in
trouble.
· Redemption:
this is ultimately the story about a troubled young sinner who has a chance to
do the right thing and redeem his self-respect, dignity and soul. This theme
ties in nicely with the backstory that Terry was a prizefighter, one who “could
have been a contender,” but lost his chance; this represents his second chance,
the ability to fight the mob bosses and stand up for the little guy.
· Sacrifice, martyrdom
and faith: Terry must make a sacrifice and risk his life and those around him
by choosing to inform on the criminals and trust in the intangible power of
faith espoused by Edie and Father Barry (which is in contrast to the very
tangible allure of money and power wielded by Friendly). Joey paid the price
earlier by being killed after informing, and he serves as a Christ-like figure
when we see his body cradled in Edie’s hands. Other religious motifs and imagery
are used throughout the film, including the shot of Father Barry ascending from
the cargo hold with Dugan’s corpse like he’s rising to heaven, and Charlie’s
body hanging slumped and dead on a hook, resembling a dead Christ-like figure.
WHAT
SYMBOLS ARE PREVALENT IN THIS MOVIE?
· The Hudson
River, which stands as a demarcation line between the exploited workers and the
majestic Manhattan skyline beyond—a line that they cannot cross due to their
symbolic slavery.
· Gloves, which
are dropped and/or removed by Edie and Charlie, leaving exposed hands that
represent their vulnerability. Terry playing with and putting on Edie’s dropped
glove, while a subtle move, indicates an intimate, sexual, harmless as well as
aggressive gesture.
· Pigeons, which
are identified with Terry and vice versa—Terry wants to live free and simple
like them, but they’re also vulnerable to the hawks he mentions to Edie; Terry
can also be viewed as a “stool pigeon” by the mob.
· Hooks, which
are used by the longshoremen in their work but which signify the heavy,
dangerous weights that hang over them literally and, in the form of Friendly’s
thugs, figuratively. Hooks also play into the talon-like imagery of the hawks
that endanger pigeons that Terry mentions.
· The rooftop,
which stands as a sanctuary and retreat from the oppressive world below and a
step closer to aspiring to new moral, religious and personal heights that
Terry, even subconsciously, yearns for. Joey was a past denizen of the rooftop,
and became a victim because of it.
OTHER
MOVIES THAT ARE BROUGHT TO MIND:
· Metropolis
· Force of Evil
· Raging Bull
· To Kill a
Mockingbird
· Gran Torino
· Hoffa
· The Yards
OTHER
FILMS BY ELIA KAZAN
· A Tree Grows in
Brooklyn
- A
Streetcar Named Desire
- Viva
Zapata!
- Baby Doll
- A Face in
the Crowd
- East of
Eden
- Splendor
in the Grass
·
Gentleman’s Agreement