Blog Directory CineVerse: March 2025

Shoeless and somewhat clueless

Wednesday, March 26, 2025

One of Hollywood's most unconventional romantic dramas from its golden age, The Barefoot Contessa (1954), written and directed by Joseph L. Mankiewicz and starring Ava Gardner, Humphrey Bogart, and Edmond O'Brien, tells the story of Maria Vargas (Gardner), a Spanish nightclub dancer who achieves Hollywood stardom but remains constrained by the expectations of the men surrounding her. The film's narrative unfolds through the perspectives of three men: Harry Dawes (Bogart), the seasoned director who discovers Maria; Oscar Muldoon (O'Brien), the fast-talking, cynical press agent instrumental in shaping her public image; and the aristocratic Count Vincenzo Torlato-Favrini (Rossano Brazzi), whose love offers hope yet ultimately leads to tragedy. The story explores Maria's relationships with powerful men, including the controlling businessman Alberto Bravano (Marius Goring), and her struggle to attain personal freedom despite her fame and beauty.

To listen to a recording of our CineVerse group discussion of The Barefoot Contessa, recorded last week, click here.


The film's unpredictable and offbeat nature is, at times, refreshing, and at others, frustrating. For instance, The Barefoot Contessa offers a privileged yet pessimistic glimpse into Hollywood insiders and the star-making system, yet the narrative curiously unfolds primarily in Italy, Spain, and France, not Hollywood. Secondly, despite top billing for Bogart and Gardner, their characters maintain a strictly platonic relationship. Thirdly, the filmmakers introduce Maria unconventionally; instead of seeing her dance, we observe a room of men captivated by her offscreen performance.

The film's central theme is the dark side of celebrity and fame. It reveals the inner workings of the Hollywood system, where powerful men discover and cultivate new talent, transforming beautiful women into stars, yet they clash for control, stifling these women's choices and freedom. New Yorker critic Richard Brody observed: “(Mankiewicz) shows the sordidness of the money-driven, ego-fuelled, ruthless machinations that are both central to the business of Hollywood and constantly threaten to derail it. And he contemplates with a lofty, rueful view (that owed nothing to the Hays Code) the cruelly unjust price that women in Hollywood paid for their sexual and personal freedom, the tragic conflicts that they endured for their resolute independence.”

The male gaze is prominent throughout the film. Maria is consistently objectified by the men around her, and her story is told primarily through their perspectives. We consistently see and hear her through the eyes and words of the men who admired her. Consider the courtroom scene where Maria testifies on her father’s behalf; we hear a summary of the proceedings through Oscar's narration.

The movie serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of putting someone on a pedestal. The Count commissions a statue of Maria, symbolizing his worship of her beauty and elegance. However, no human is a perfect physical specimen or deity deserving of unquestioned adulation. Maria, though uniquely lovely, is an imperfect human being who cannot be "preserved in stone" or controlled by any man. Similarly, the film reinforces the impossibility of truly knowing and understanding another person. The fact that The Barefoot Contessa is told via flashbacks from the perspectives of three different men, each with their own interpretation of Maria’s personality and character, underscores her complexity and unpredictability.

Like many memorable romantic dramas, this work explores the dichotomy between romantic illusion and sobering reality. Maria yearns for true love, happiness, and sexual freedom, but her relationships are doomed by circumstances and societal expectations. She maintains her free spirit, resisting conformity, but ultimately faces tragic consequences for her choices.

Yet, despite these thematic achievements, the picture may leave some audiences unsatisfied, with several questions unresolved (spoilers ahead):
  • Why does Maria so quickly and impulsively leave with these men, particularly Count Vincenzo, Alberto, and Harry/Kirk? What motivates her hasty actions?
  • Why does Bogart’s character disappear for most of the second half, including a full 30 minutes after the midpoint?
  • Why did Vincenzo not inform Maria of his impotence before asking her to marry him and continue his family line?
  • Why did Maria not ask Vincenzo if he would accept her conceiving a child with another man to continue his lineage? Is this not a flawed plan?
  • Why is Harry not more emotionally devastated and angry at Vincenzo when Maria is killed?
  • Why is Vincenzo permitted to attend the funeral of his deceased wife, whom he murdered?
  • What’s up with the film's bizarre original poster, depicting Maria embraced by an amorphous, monstrous figure (shown above)?
Two fascinating trivia tidbits: Maria’s character and story are loosely based on Rita Hayworth, a former Latin dancer who became a star and was widely desired (although reports also suggest the role drew inspiration from actress Anne Chevalier and Ava Gardner herself). O'Brien was the film's sole Academy Award winner, receiving Best Supporting Actor. Notably, he is also the only actor named Oscar to win an Oscar.

Similar works

  • Citizen Kane (1941), especially with the multiple flashbacks recollecting on the dead titular character
  • The Bad and the Beautiful (1952)
  • The Valley of the Dolls (1967)
  • A Star Is Born (1954) – A tale of fame, love, and tragedy in the film industry, starring Judy Garland and James Mason.
  • La Dolce Vita (1960) – Federico Fellini’s masterpiece about celebrity culture and the emptiness of fame in Rome.
  • Gilda (1946) – A glamorous and tragic film noir starring Rita Hayworth, featuring themes of passion, betrayal, and power.
  • My Last Duchess, a poem by Robert Browning

Other films by Joseph L Mankiewicz

  • A Letter to Three Wives (1949)
  • House of Strangers (1949)
  • No Way Out (1950)
  • All About Eve (1950)
  • People Will Talk (1951)
  • Julius Caesar (1953)
  • Guys and Dolls (1955)
  • Cleopatra (1963)
  • Sleuth (1972)

Read more...

Green Border, red flags

Thursday, March 20, 2025

From Schindler’s List to 12 Years a Slave, some films based on atrocious events in human history prove difficult to watch, challenging viewers with realistic violence and disturbing subject matter. A more recent example is Green Border (2023), a powerful drama that captures the struggles of refugees trapped between Belarus and Poland in 2021. The story follows a Syrian family—Bashir (Jalal Altawil), his wife Amina (Dalia Naous), their children, and Bashir’s father (Mohamad Al Rashi)—as they attempt to reach Sweden, crossing paths with Leila (Behi Djanati Atai), an Afghan teacher also seeking asylum. Meanwhile, Julia (Maja Ostaszewska), a Polish psychologist turned activist, and conflicted border guard Jan (Tomasz Włosok) provide additional perspectives on the humanitarian crisis. Directed by Agnieszka Holland and filmed in stark black-and-white – which adds a sheen of newsy authenticity, shadowy weight, and thematic gravitas to the story and the characters – this work is notable for its gripping performances and unflinching critique of political exploitation, sparking significant discussion on human rights and remains a vital work in contemporary cinema.

To listen to a recording of our CineVerse group discussion of Green Border, conducted last week, click here.


Green Border is segmented into four different chapters. Part one focuses primarily on a Muslim family, represented by three different generations, seeking escape from Syria but being turned into political hot potatoes by countries they thought would be sympathetic to their plight. The second chapter focuses primarily on Jan, an expectant father who participates in the despicable treatment of the displaced foreigners but who resultantly suffers a crisis of conscience. Part three follows a colorful band of activists, including new convert Julia, who strategize to bring aid to these political victims. The brief epilogue covers how millions of Ukrainian refugees are granted asylum or temporary protection in Poland and across Europe. Chapters 2 and 3 are particularly important, as are the characters of Julia and Janek, who stand as surrogates for the audience: witnesses to the ruthless way these migrants are treated who, like viewers, may be motivated to get involved.

Set in 2021 to 2022, and released only a year later, Green Border has a political zeitgeist feeling of urgency and immediacy, bringing attention to a serious humanitarian crisis that has actually been going on for the past 10 years. The European migrant crisis began in 2015 with large numbers of refugees from conflict zones like Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, and later Africa, arriving in Eastern European countries such as Hungary, Poland, and Bulgaria. More recently, the crisis intensified with Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, displacing over 7 million Ukrainians, while the Belarus-EU migrant crisis in 2021 further exacerbated the region's challenges. American viewers may be less aware of this ongoing problem on the other side of the globe, but Green Border’s setting and troubling narrative also coincide with the ongoing debate in the U.S. over illegal immigrants and how they are being rounded up and deported today.

The Guardian’s Peter Bradshaw described it as “a sombre, yet gripping movie in what feels like two separate genres: a movie about the eastern front in the second world war, or the first world war, or perhaps an entirely different, futurist film: a post-apocalyptic drama in which the forest is the site of some frantic survival-struggle experienced by people whose humanity has been almost entirely stripped from them, as if by some nuclear blast or germ warfare strike…Green Border is a tough watch: a punch to the solar plexus. But a vital bearing of cinematic witness to what is happening in Europe right now.”

At its core, the film thematically explores the heartless and inhumane playing of political pawns. Bashir and his multi-generational family, as well as all the other refugees we observe alongside them, are powerless pieces on a chessboard being played by Belarus and Poland. The Belarus-Poland border crisis is part of a broader geopolitical struggle involving Belarus, Russia, the EU, and NATO, with tensions escalating due to Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko’s close ties with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Since 2021, Belarus has been accused of deliberately funneling migrants—mainly from the Middle East and Africa—toward the EU as retaliation for sanctions, a tactic seen as hybrid warfare aimed at destabilizing Europe while diverting attention from Russia’s war in Ukraine. With Putin backing Lukashenko, Poland has responded by militarizing its border and pushing back the refugees dropped onto its borders by Belarus.

Additionally, the movie examines the courage needed to commit to an ethical cause for the right reasons. There’s an exchange in Green Border where one of the activists criticizes passive liberals for only wanting to help refugees to soothe their sense of guilt. By depicting Julia’s transition from concerned observer to risk-taking activist and depicting Janek’s inner moral conflict at being at first a callous border soldier contributing to the cruelty but later a silent resister to the established order by not apprehending Bashir’s family-in-hiding, Holland is attempting to motivate viewers to think beyond good intentions and well wishes and become more proactive in this humanitarian crisis.

Viewers see evidence of the immense value inherent in even small gestures of care and kindness. Julia and her fellow activists bring food, clothing, medicine, comfort, and advice to the hapless migrants. While they are not able to legally shield them from the Polish border police, the supplies and treatment they provide give these sufferers hope, even temporarily, in a mostly hopeless situation.

That infusion of positivity is important. “Holland‘s bruisingly powerful new refugee drama ultimately comes from a place of optimism,” per Variety critic Jessica Kiang. “It is optimistic to expect and to nurture a reaction of potentially motivating outrage, when you portray the brutality of which human individuals, at the behest of human institutions, are capable. It is optimistic to believe that, faced with extraordinary cruelty, a viewer’s ordinary decency will be compelled to rise and rebel. Green Border…wraps its social critique in the razor wire of punchy, intelligent cinematic craft in order to elicit precisely such emotions. If we can feel the horror, perhaps there is hope.”

Green Border also reminds us that refugees are human beings, each with unique needs and personalities. Migrants and expatriates seeking asylum and sanctuary deserve dignity and have human rights that shouldn’t be violated, even if they are technically breaking the law. With so many countries in chaos and sociopolitical conflict growing, the immigration crisis is increasingly complex and warrants further rational dialogue, even if it ultimately means that that person isn’t legally allowed entry into their chosen country of migration.


Similar works

  • El Norte (1983) – A poignant drama about two Guatemalan siblings fleeing civil war and attempting to build a new life in the United States.
  • In This World (2002) – A documentary-style drama following two Afghan refugees on a perilous journey from Pakistan to the UK.
  • Babel (2006) – A multi-narrative drama exploring global interconnectedness, including the plight of an undocumented immigrant.
  • Welcome (2009) – A French film about an Iraqi-Kurdish teenager trying to cross the English Channel to reunite with his girlfriend.
  • Mediterranea (2015) – A gripping film following two African migrants as they navigate the dangers of illegal immigration to Italy.
  • The Other Side of Hope (2017) – A Finnish film by Aki Kaurismäki, blending humor and drama in the story of a Syrian refugee seeking asylum in Helsinki.
  • Human Flow (2017) – Ai Weiwei’s documentary about the global refugee crisis, showcasing the struggles and resilience of displaced people worldwide.
  • Quo Vadis, Aida? (2020) – A harrowing drama about the 1995 Srebrenica massacre, told through the perspective of a UN translator trying to save her family.
  • Io Capitano (2023) – A powerful Italian film about two Senegalese teenagers who embark on a perilous journey to Europe, facing exploitation and danger along the way.

Other films by Agnieszka Holland

  • Europa Europa
  • Total Eclipse
  • The Secret Garden
  • In Darkness
  • Charlatan
  • Spoor
  • Mr. Jones
  • Angry Harvest

Read more...

Answer me these questions three

Sunday, March 16, 2025


What’s the greatest British comedy ever made? What film persists as perhaps the most re-quoted by fans over the past 50 years? And what work is primarily responsible for most of the world coming to know and love Graham Chapman, John Cleese, Eric Idle, Terry Gilliam, Michael Palin and Terry Jones? 

The answer to all these questions is, of course, Monty Python and the Holy Grail, released 50 years ago this month. Co-directed by two of the Pythons – Gilliam and Jones –the movie takes a satirical buzzsaw to the legend of King Arthur and his Knights of the Round Table, chronicling their bizarre and often ridiculous journey to locate the titular golden chalice. Along the way, Arthur (played by Chapman) and his faithful band encounter a series of absurd obstacles, including the stubborn Black Knight (Cleese), the peculiar Knights Who Say "Ni" (led by Palin), the ferocious Rabbit of Caerbannog, and a bridgekeeper with a penchant for, let’s say, difficult questions. The cast members take on multiple roles, with Cleese portraying Sir Lancelot, Palin as Sir Galahad, Jones as Sir Bedevere, and Idle as Sir Robin.

Click here to listen to a recording of our CineVerse group discussion of this film, conducted earlier this month. To hear the March Cineversary podcast episode celebrating Holy Grail’s 50th anniversary, click here.


Holy Grail, due in large part to its limited resources and shoestring budget (amazingly, it was financed in part by members of Pink Floyd, Led Zeppelin, Jethro Tull, and Genesis because the Pythons lacked financial backers), wasn’t afraid to defy audience expectations for a heroic adventure, historical costume drama, or feature-length satire, often deviating wildly from film storytelling formula and traditional comedy approaches.

The movie, which functions more as a series of gags and sketch pieces loosely strung together by a thin plot, didn’t balk at irritating its audience with the unexpected, including silly credits and Swedish subtitles, crudely animated interstitials, a phony intermission title card, an abrupt unresolved ending, and the absence of credits at the end. It had the guts to make fun of its ultra-low budget and employ edgy animation to depict otherwise unfilmable scenes, yet it still achieves a visually realistic look with its period-accurate costumes and props, dirty aesthetics, and authentic castle settings (thanks to its being shot on location in Scotland).

The comedy is absurd, silly, and random, mixing metaphors while managing to offend multiple groups equally, including the religious, the royal, the ignorant, the politically minded, the class/caste system, homosexuals, and women. It also defies the rules of classic narrative structure by having characters talk to the camera and its medieval universe unexpectedly invaded by 20th-century characters – namely a contemporary detective and two bobbies, whose reappearance becomes a crucial repeated joke.

Interestingly, the Grail itself functions as a Hitchcockian McGuffin – a device that motivates the characters but is never seen or obtained, further upending our expectations.

Per Alternate Ending essayist Timothy Brayton, Holy Grail “provided an excellent vehicle for the dominant form of comedy in the Pythons' work, the aggressively weird conceptual gags in which something inordinately surreal plunges right on through a normal environment, generally leaving the characters inside that environment quite baffled and upset. Generally speaking, the group's favorite target for their absurd sensibilities were the most staid and English of situations…its travesty, satire, and parody are well-augmented by the precision of its surrealism, which only seems random. In fact, the film carefully builds up a series of comic motifs and call-backs, giving the whole thing a rather elegant structure that gives all of the jokes a feeling of inevitability even as they seem spectacularly random.”

DVD Savant critic Glenn Erickson wrote that the film “withstands the weight of its own jolly pointlessness by virtue of a series of self-reflexive jokes aimed at deflating the pomposity of the epic movie format.” Reflect, for instance, on how the rousing score serves as an ironic musical bed for the silly situations, drab settings, and cowardly or unheroic actions of the protagonists.

Holy Grail also earns points as a comedy that feels contemporary, despite its 50-year vintage, because it’s so self-aware and meta, often joking about its low production values with lines like “It’s only a model” in reference to the image of a grand castle off in the distance.

It’s further deserving of celebration because it remains among the most quoted films of all time. Fans across the globe continue to mimic some of its most famous lines, including “We are the Knights who say ‘Ni!’” “Bring out your dead!” “I’m not dead yet!” “Help! Help! I’m being repressed!” “It’s just a flesh wound.” “On second thought, let’s not go to Camelot. It is a silly place.” “None shall pass!” and “Your mother was a hamster, and your father smelt of elderberries!”

This work is also worthy of kudos because it continues to rank highly as one of the greatest comedies ever created. In 2000, readers of Total Film magazine ranked Monty Python and the Holy Grail as the fifth-greatest comedy film of all time. In 2006, a Channel 4 poll of British viewers placed Holy Grail sixth on the list of the 50 Greatest Comedy Films. In 2011, an ABC and People magazine poll revealed that Holy Grail was the second-best comedy of all time, behind Airplane!. And in 2016, Empire magazine ranked Holy Grail 18th on its list of the 100 Best British Films.

What is it about the Python sense of humor and comic sensibilities that made Holy Grail so successful? Monty Python’s brand of comedy was characterized by its dry, British-style wit, often delivered in a deadpan manner that enhances the funniness through understatement and irony. Their humor was irreverent, satirical, surreal, and absurd, frequently challenging conventional comedic structures and defying expectations with bizarre, nonsensical, and unexpected punchlines. The group consisted of a small, all-male troupe – John Cleese, Terry Gilliam, Terry Jones, Michael Palin, Graham Chapman, and Eric Idle – with its six members frequently playing multiple roles, often in exaggerated and deliberately unconvincing ways.

Their sketches and films featured satirical songs, which mock societal norms, historical events, and political issues with catchy tunes and darkly comedic lyrics. Case in point: the Knights of the Round Table tune and the snarky minstrel’s Bravely Bold Sir Robin ballads. The sextet also enjoyed subverting established canon or assumed characteristics. So instead of Bedivere the Wise, Brave Sir Robin, or Galahad the Chaste we get Bedivere the dunderhead, Robin the runaway, and Galahad the sexual opportunist.

A signature element of their comedy was the mixing of metaphors, such as blending a murder mystery or police procedural with a medieval action story or inserting 20th-century political issues—like repression and voting—into a medieval setting, creating anachronistic and highly satirical humor.

Like other comedy masters, the Pythons employed running gags for maximum comic effect, as evidenced by characters repeatedly saying they’re “not dead yet,” repeated mentions of swallows and shrubberies, Arthur consistently confusing the number 3 for 5, the darkly humorous lyrics of Sir Robin’s minstrel, the recurrent violence against shrieking cats, or the cowardly retreats continually made by Arthur’s supposedly valiant group.

The Pythons frequently played with gender roles and stereotypes, using cross-dressing and exaggerated performances to lampoon societal norms and expectations. We see, for example, Terry Jones playing a peasant woman, and John Cleese chewing the scenery as an insulting French Taunter.

Their humor could also be described as random and anarchic, often featuring abrupt scene transitions, unexpected fourth-wall breaks, ridiculous title credits, a sudden “Intermission” title card, and deliberately nonsensical plot developments. They regularly used speech impediments as comedic devices, too, exaggerating accents or lisps to create absurd characters.

Additionally, the Pythons frequently spoofed violence, warfare, barbarism, and Christianity-fueled carnage, using exaggerated brutality and slapstick-style gore to highlight the absurdity of historical and modern conflicts. Recall the Black Knight, who’s left with four bloodied stumps after his limbs are hacked off by Arthur, or the stuffy religious ritualism that prefaces the use of the Holy Hand Grenade.

Their work included head-trippy, psychedelic, two-dimensional animation as well, most famously created by Gilliam, which linked sketches together with surreal, often grotesque or crude imagery, such as the cartoon trumpeters who use their posteriors to play their instruments.

Embracing low-budget opportunism, Monty Python made clever use of simple props, costumes, and settings, commonly turning limitations into comedic strengths. Exhibit A: The simple syncopated clapping of two coconut shells and actors pantomiming a horse trot substituted for the lack of real horses which the filmmakers could not afford. Exhibit B: Gilliam’s madcap cartoonery depicting characters and escapades, such as the Black Beast of Aaargh or God appearing in the heavens, that otherwise would have required costly and elaborate special effects.

In an Uproxx essay, writer Matt Prigg posited: “After Holy Grail, the flood gates opened. It’s the movie that every sketch comedy troupe aspires to make, from Cheech and Chong to Kids in the Hall, from Broken Lizard to SNL. Wet Hot American Summer, Mo’ Money, and Run Ronnie Run owe it their lives as well. Even movies that are simply sketches, with no story, like The Kentucky Fried Movie, only exist because Python made it safe for sketch comedy troupes to invade the big screen, and you might as well throw the Muppets in there, too…It’s not hard to imagine Grail being a watershed movie for those into gory horror-comedies — people like Sam Raimi, the late Stuart Gordon, Peter Jackson, Edgar Wright, who must have thought this PG-rated comedy was onto something.”

Ponder that Saturday Night Live, the definitive American TV sketch comedy show, debuted just a few months after Holy Grail’s release and less than a year after the Flying Circus television show ended its five-year run.

Additionally, ruminate on how few British feature films before Monty Python and the Holy Grail were widely accepted by Americans. There were Ealing comedies like The Lavender Hill Mob (1951) and The Ladykillers (1955), the Richard Lester musical comedies A Hard Day’s Night (1964) and Help! (1965) starring the Beatles, and Bedazzled (1967) with Dudley Moore and Peter Cook, but little else.

Following Holy Grail, America and the world benefited from a plethora of British film comedies, including two more Python features – The Life of Brian (1979), and The Meaning of Life (1983) – as well as A Fish Called Wanda (1988), Four Weddings and a Funeral (1994), The Full Monty (1997), Notting Hill (1999), Edgar Wright pictures like Shaun of the Dead (2004) and Hot Fuzz (2007), Nick Park stop-motion animated films like Chicken Run (2000) and Wallace & Gromit: Curse of the Were-Rabbit (2005), and the live-action animated Paddington movies (2014 and 2017), among many others.

Holy Grail’s pervasive reach can also be traced across several other works, as well, including pictures directed by Gilliam that showcase flawed heroic quests and compromised heroes like Jabberwocky (1977), Time Bandits (1981), The Adventures of Baron Munchausen (1989), The Fisher King (1991), The Brothers Grimm (2005), and The Man Who Killed Don Quixote (2018); Terry Jones’s Erik the Viking (1989), which also continues this tradition of imperfect heroes; History of the World Part I (1981) – Mel Brooks’ irreverent historical sendup appears to be an obvious descendent; This Is Spinal Tap (1984), in which Rob Reiner borrows Holy Grail's deadpan delivery and absurdist humor while also mimicking its low-budget aesthetic to blur the line between satire and reality; The Princess Bride (1987), Reiner’s parody of fantasy and adventure tropes that shares Holy Grail's playful medieval satire, subverting traditional heroic tales with comedic battle scenes, absurd dialogue, and a similar "None shall pass!" moment; Life is Cheap...But Toilet Paper is Expensive (1989) a surrealistic indie that embraces Holy Grail's surreal and chaotic humor, using no-frills filmmaking as a comedic device much like Monty Python did; Army of Darkness (1992), in which Sam Raimi parodies medieval epics with exaggerated slapstick, absurd anachronisms, and a bumbling hero reminiscent of Python’s take on King Arthur; Shrek (2001), which mocks fairy tale tropes with dry British wit, anachronistic humor, comedic songs, and absurd characters, much like Holy Grail did with Arthurian legend; Your Highness (2011), a film that follows Holy Grail's irreverent approach to knights and quests, replacing dry wit with crude humor while keeping the self-aware, anachronistic dialogue; Deadpool (2016), A superhero flick that channels Holy Grail's comedic style by frequently breaking the fourth wall and showcasing comedic gore; and Disenchantment (2018), Matt Groening’s animated series, which takes place in a medieval fantasy kingdom and owes more than a tip of the cap to Holy Grail. And Monty Python and the Holy Grail also fueled the creation of the Broadway musical Spamalot, with lyrics by Eric Idle, which enjoyed significant success and one multiple Tony Awards including Best Musical.

Predecessors that may have inspired the Python players include Spike Milligan and the Goon Show, the 1967 movie Camelot, and the 1974 film Lancelot of the Lake. Additionally, Holy Grail gives subtle nods to earlier movies that likely inspired the Pythons, among them Duck Soup (particularly its “We’re Going To War” song, elements of which seep into the Camelot number); The Wizard of Oz (recall how the imposing leader of the Knights who say Ni terrifies Arthur’s band and requests that they bring him a shrubbery, much like the Wizard asks Dorothy and company to fetch him the broomstick of the Wicked Witch of the West); The Seventh Seal by Bergman (which also depicts flagellation and a witch-burning and includes Swedish subtitles in the opening credits); and Ivan the Terrible Part I (Prince Herbert is an effeminate, dim-witted royal forced into an unwanted marriage, similar to Prince Vladimir from the Sergei Eisenstein film).

Several giants in comedy have credited the Pythons with significantly inspiring or impressing them. Martin Short said: ''Their influence was that absurdity in character could replace the punchline, the ba-dum-bum thing.'' Per Tommy Chong, ''They were the first to really show the world how funny men dressed as women could look.'' Tina Fey remarked: ''Sketch endings are overrated. Their key was to do something as long as it was funny and then just stop and do something else.'' Simpsons creator Matt Groening said: ''I just saw this streak in British humor of whimsical surrealism with just a hint of cruelty, and I found that incredibly appealing.'' He said he was motivated by Monty Python's "high-velocity sense of the absurd and not stopping to explain yourself." And SNL alum Mike Myers declared: ''Everything I've ever done can be distilled to at least one Python sketch. If comedy had a periodic element table, Python would have more than one atom on it.''

Believe it or not, it’s possible for a film as ridiculous as Monty Python and the Holy Grail to have themes. For starters, it’s hard to ignore the overall Python pessimism about human beings and their innate stupidity, pomposity, cruelty, and barbarism, which has been demonstrated throughout history. “Grail is as funny as a movie can get, but it is also a tough-minded picture – as outraged about the human propensity for violence as it is outrageous in its attack on that propensity,” according to the late film critic Richard Schickel.

In tandem with this thought, Holy Grail also emphasizes the unjust subjugation and suffering of the lower classes. We hear the peasants say: “Help! Help! I’m being repressed!" "We’re all individuals!" "I didn’t vote for you!" "You can’t expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you!"

Perhaps the biggest message gleaned from all this absurdity is that there are no sacred cows: Even venerated legendary characters like King Arthur and his knights, as well as their gallant quest, are fair game for farce. Holy Grail suggests an inherent fallacy in classical heroism and skewers the assumption that ancient monarchs and their loyal chevaliers were chivalrous, honorable, morally righteous, spiritually motivated, or ordained by the Almighty. 

The golden gift of the grail may have eluded King Arthur and his knights in this impish iteration of the myth, but the quest to thoroughly amuse its audience is undoubtedly achieved by Chapman, Cleese, Gilliam, Idle, Jones, and Palin, and that represents this work’s most plentiful present to viewers. The absurd and irreverent lens through which the Pythons view this legend, and the irrepressibly hilarious way they weave contemporary culture into a quasi-haughty narrative – cleverly placing banana peels along the path from Camelot and consequently tripping up the self-important, sanctimonious, and simpleminded – never fails to entertain. No rewatch is wasted, as the troupe has carefully constructed the comedy with multiple layers of mirth that can be peeled back and re-appreciated or freshly discovered. Many of the jokes effortlessly land a perfect bullseye on the first viewing. But umpteenth watches can yield unexpected yuks that you probably missed, like the chicken image on Sir Robin’s shield, the fact that the stream the Black Knight is guarding is tiny and can easily be crossed without using the bridge, the old man among the crowd with shaving cream on his face, the “with special extra thanks to” opening credits signed by Richard Nixon, the mustache on the face of the sun symbol worn by Arthur, and the sudden reanimation of the wedding guests killed by Lancelot in Swamp Castle who break out into song with the rest of the throng. Holy Grail appeals to the lowbrow, the highbrow, and all brows in between with unbridled zaniness, witty satire, physical comedy that defies physics, and cutting politico-cultural commentary one minute and fart jokes the next. It’s a grand bouillabaisse of clownery with special English herbs and spices, and more than a handful of spam thrown in for good measure, that make for an endlessly fulfilling feast of funniness.

Read more...

Cineversary podcast celebrates 50th anniversary of Monty Python and the Holy Grail

Thursday, March 13, 2025

In Cineversary podcast episode #80, host ⁠Erik Martin⁠ lifts a golden chalice to toast the golden anniversary of Monty Python and the Holy Grail, directed by Terry Gilliam and Terry Jones. Joining him on this quest is Darl Larsen, a film and animation professor at Brigham Young University and author of A Book About the Film Monty Python and the Holy Grail. Together, they collect several nice and inexpensive shrubberies, decipher obscure Swedish subtitles, and try to convince listeners that they’re not quite dead as they explore why this film still matters 50 years later.
Darl Larsen

To listen to this episode, click here or click the "play" button on the embedded streaming player below. Or, you can stream, download, or subscribe to Cineversary wherever you get your podcasts, including Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

Learn more about the Cineversary podcast at www.cineversary.com and email show comments or suggestions to cineversarypodcast@gmail.com.

Read more...

Fresh blood in a tired subgenre

Tuesday, March 4, 2025

Imagine a vampire movie in which bloodsucking takes a backseat, the Gothic castle in East Europe is replaced by a dilapidated Queen Anne-style home in Detroit, and the undead are rockstar hipsters. That pretty much sums up Only Lovers Left Alive, a 2013 film written and directed by Jim Jarmusch that offers a hypnotic and atmospheric take on this horror subgenre. The narrative centers on Adam (Tom Hiddleston), a reclusive and melancholic musician in Detroit, and his centuries-old lover, Eve (Tilda Swinton), who resides in Tangier. As Adam sinks deeper into despair over the state of the modern world, Eve journeys to be with him, rekindling their love and shared reverence for art, history, and human culture. Their tranquil existence is upended by the arrival of Eve’s wild and impulsive younger sister, Ava (Mia Wasikowska), whose reckless behavior throws their world into disarray. John Hurt appears as Christopher Marlowe, a fellow vampire and Eve’s trusted confidant, while Anton Yelchin plays Ian, a mortal who aids Adam in acquiring rare instruments.

To listen to a recording of our CineVerse group discussion of Only Lovers Left Alive, conducted last week, click here.


Jarmusch and his collaborators suffuse the vampire mythos with fresh and fascinating ideas, including vampires as connoisseurs of art, culture, and coolness; vampire soulmates who truly love each other emotionally, intellectually, and physically; world-weary members of the undead who experience ennui and suicidal thoughts; and nosferatu who look upon actual bloodsucking for sustenance as primitive, choosing instead to curate only the finest available supply of intoxicating red corpuscles via the black market.

The concept of undying characters who acquire vast knowledge and appreciation for the true masterminds of science, literature, music, and the arts – and who can also instantly identify modern-day prodigies – is one of the most thought-provoking aspects of Only Lovers Left Alive.

As is true of many Jarmusch movies, not much happens here. This is more a film about the feels, about luxuriating in gothy Bohemian spaces with finely cultured dagger-toothed dandies who happen to be vampires and the artistic and erudite accouterment they prefer surrounding themselves with. The pace is unapologetically languid, but the chill tone, shadowy cinematography, and fully inhabited performances more than make up for a skeletal narrative.

This is less a genre film or horror feature than a romantic character study. Yes, there are forays into vampiric lore, including the need to drink blood and avoid sunlight. And Jarmusch even introduces a new trope in nosferatu mythology: the wearing of leather gloves outside of the vampire’s habitat. However, the horror elements play second fiddle to the fascinating romance dynamic and personality contrasts between Adam and Eve: He’s often clad in black and she in white, suggesting their oppositeness.

Jarmusch was quoted in an interview saying: “Obviously, it’s not a horror movie, as most vampire movies are…I think it’s just the overview that it allowed, because they’ve been alive so long, to show a love story that spans that amount of time… To be able to see their perception of history over long period of times, was really interactive to me. And their own love story, to span that amount of time, was what drew me to it.”

The filmmakers are aware that Adam and Eve are fair game for criticism by viewers as cold and snobbishly unrelatable highbrows; but Ava calling them out on this behavior as she’s kicked out of their home helps defuse this criticism.

What’s Only Lovers Left Alive really about? Societal and cultural decay, of course. This vampire duo represents an enlightened, aristocratic, and elitist pair who, thanks to their immortality, can accurately observe both progress and devolution on Earth. They refer to mortals as “zombies,” the relatively uneducated proletariat who have allowed the world to decline and who don’t appreciate the fine details of nature nor the works of geniuses that history has often overlooked.

But more than that, this is a testament to timeless love and commitment. Adam and Eve have been married since 1868 and remain loyal and devoted to each other, even though they often spend long spans apart separated by continents. They resonate as empathetic romantics who eschew traditional vampire violence, defying the typical trope of the selfish, predatory, and barbaric bloodsucker.

Takeaway #3? Creativity, curiosity, and a thirst for knowledge fuel the drive to survive and thrive. We see how much Eve treasures her favorite books and authors and maintains a wondrous curiosity about even the smallest details in nature, such as mushrooms growing where they shouldn’t be. Adam is motivated by the desire to experiment with music, an inquisitiveness that compels him to seek out and play antique instruments – which suggests that part of the secret to successful innovation is to respect the past and its pioneers. Perhaps what prevents Adam from killing himself with the wooden bullet, besides his love for Eve, is his passion for music.

Slate critic Sharan Shetty believes appreciating Eve is the key to better understanding what he believes is this film’s central tenet: “Jarmusch skeptics may mistake vampire Adam’s incessant odes to dead artists and thinkers as a surrogate for the director’s own high-minded nostalgia. But Only Lovers is not a lament for the way things were; it’s a paean to Eve, to a hope for the future. Swinton’s character is inspiring, her worship of the world all the more surprising because it flows not from a curious child but from a centuries-old creature of the night. She should be more jaded; she is not. She at times seems like the only lover, anywhere, who is actually alive.”

Similar works

  • The Man Who Fell to Earth (1976) – A melancholic, existential sci-fi film starring David Bowie as an alien trapped on Earth
  • The Hunger (1983) – A stylish and melancholic vampire film starring Catherine Deneuve, David Bowie, and Susan Sarandon
  • Wings of Desire (1987) – A poetic film about angels observing human life, capturing a similar longing and detachment
  • Three Colors: Blue (1993), and Three Colors: Red (1994)
  • Let the Right One In (2008) – A haunting and poetic Swedish vampire film about loneliness and connection
  • Thirst (2009) – Park Chan-wook’s dark, sensual, and philosophical take on the vampire myth
  • Byzantium (2012) – a gothic vampire film about two immortal women hiding their past because it threatens their survival
  • Under the Skin (2013) – A slow, eerie sci-fi film starring Scarlett Johansson as an alien hunting humans
  • A Girl Walks Home Alone at Night (2014) – An Iranian black-and-white vampire film with a dreamy, arthouse feel
  • I'm Thinking of Ending Things (2020) – a surreal psychological horror-drama about reality unraveling during a tense visit to a farmhouse

Other films by Jim Jarmusch

  • Stranger Than Paradise (1984)
  • Down by Law (1986)
  • Mystery Train (1989)
  • Night on Earth (1991)
  • Dead Man (1995)
  • Ghost Dog: The Way of the Samurai (1999)
  • Coffee and Cigarettes (2003)
  • Broken Flowers (2005)
  • The Dead Don't Die (2019)

Read more...

  © Blogger template Cumulus by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP